3
$\begingroup$

Recently I'm studying PSG and I felt very puzzled about two statements appeared in Wen's paper. To present the questions clearly, imagine that we use the Shwinger-fermion $\mathbf{S}_i=\frac{1}{2}f_i^\dagger\mathbf{\sigma}f_i$ mean-field method to study the 2D spin-1/2 system, and get a mean-field Hamiltonian $H(\psi_i)=\sum_{ij}(\psi_i^\dagger u_{ij}\psi_j+\psi_i^T \eta_{ij}\psi_j+H.c.)+\sum_i\psi_i^\dagger h_i\psi_i$, where $\psi_i=(f_{i\uparrow},f_{i\downarrow}^\dagger)^T$, $u_{ij}$ and $\eta_{ij}$ are $2\times2$ complex matrices, and $h_i$ are $2\times2$ Hermitian matrices. And the projection to the spin subspace is implemented by projective operator $P=\prod _i(2\hat{n}_i-\hat{n}_i^2)$(Note here $P\neq \prod _i(1-\hat{n}_{i\uparrow}\hat{n}_{i\downarrow})$). My questions are:

(1)How to arrive at Eq.(15) ? Eq.(15) means that, if $\Psi$ and $\widetilde{\Psi}$ are the mean-field ground states of $H(\psi_i)$ and $H(\widetilde{\psi_i})$, respectively, then $P\widetilde{\Psi}\propto P\Psi$, where $\widetilde{\psi_i}=G_i\psi_i,G_i\in SU(2)$. How to prove this statement?

(2)The statement of translation symmetry above Eq.(16), which can be formulated as follows: Let $D:\psi_i\rightarrow \psi_{i+a}$ be the unitary translation operator($a$ is the lattice vector). If there exists a $SU(2)$ transformation $\psi_i\rightarrow\widetilde{\psi_i}=G_i\psi_i,G_i\in SU(2)$ such that $DH(\psi_i)D^{-1}=H(\widetilde{\psi_i})$, then the projected spin state $P\Psi$ has translation symmetry $D(P\Psi)\propto P\Psi $, where $\Psi$ is the mean-field ground state of $H(\psi_i)$. How to prove this statement?

I have been struggling with the above two puzzles for several days and still can't understand them. I will be very appreciated for your answer, thank you very much.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I retagged your post if you don't mind (see the edit summary). By the way, +1 to this question and its answers. $\endgroup$ – Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir Sep 27 '13 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ @ DImension10 Abhimanyu PS, thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – Kai Li Sep 27 '13 at 20:44
1
$\begingroup$

I just found that I can prove my second puzzle (2) if (1) is true:

Note that in (2), the ground state of $H(\widetilde{\psi_i})$ is $\widetilde{\Psi}=D\Psi$, then according to (1), we have $P\widetilde{\Psi}\propto P\Psi$. And $[P,D]=0$, therefore, $D(P\Psi)=PD\Psi=P\widetilde{\Psi}\propto P\Psi$.

Remark: More generally, the statement (2) can be generalized to any kind of symmetry represented by an unitary(or antiunitary, like time-reversal) operator $A$. But its correctness is based on the fact $[P,A]=0$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Finally, I can answer the puzzle (1) now:

Let $\mathbf{J}_i=\frac{1}{2}\psi_i^\dagger\mathbf{\sigma}\psi_i$ be the gauge-charge operators, and $R_i$ represent the local $SU(2)$ gauge-rotation operators generated by $\mathbf{J}_i$.

Then $R_i\psi_iR_i^{-1}=G_i\psi_i,G_i\in SU(2)$. Thus in (1), $H(G_i\psi_i)=RH(\psi_i)R^{-1}$, where $R=\prod _iR_i$. So the ground state of $H(G_i\psi_i)$ is $\widetilde{\Psi}=R\Psi$, therefore, $P\widetilde{\Psi}=PR\Psi=P\Psi$.

Note here we have used the fact $PR=RP=P$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.