0
$\begingroup$

In the Fermi weak theory we have the fermion bilinears which look like

$$ V_\mu = \bar{\psi} \gamma_\mu\psi $$ $$ A_\mu = \bar{\psi} \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \psi $$

Under a parity transformation

$$ x = (x_0, \vec{x}) \rightarrow \tilde{x} = ( x_0, - \vec{x}) $$

The fields transform like

$$ V^\mu(x) \rightarrow V_\mu(\tilde{x}) $$ $$ A^\mu(x) \rightarrow - A_\mu(\tilde{x}) $$

Why do the contravariant indices transform to covariant indices as well as a coordinate transformation? I thought it would have something to do with the fact that you also have to transform the actual vector components under a coordinate/parity transformation, but I don´t know how to formalize it starting from the explicit form of the bilinears.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

A four vector $V^\mu$ has components that we can regard as $(\rho, {\bf j})$. Under parity the charge $\rho$ does not change, but the current changes sign: $P:{\bf j}\mapsto -{\bf j}$. If the metric signature is $(+,-,-,-)$ one way to say this is $V^\mu \to V_\mu$. If the metric were $(-,+,+,+)$ we would have to say $V^\mu\to -V_\mu$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Why does the sign of the first time component change under parity? If only the spatial part changes sign. $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 18:23
  • $\begingroup$ Also, why does the sign change for $A_\mu$? $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2023 at 18:25
  • $\begingroup$ Because with the $(+,-,-,-)$ signature $A^0=A_0$ but $A^i=-A_i$ for $i=1,2,3$. $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Commented May 29, 2023 at 19:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.