1
$\begingroup$

I am just looking for the correct Ansatz to a one-dimensional diffusion equation with a harmonic potential.

Let $n(x,t)$ be the density of particles and $\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\alpha x²$ a potential. Then the current density is $$j(x,t)=-D\frac{\partial n(x,t)}{\partial x}-\sigma \left(-\vec\nabla_x \Phi(x) \right)$$ with $D$ as diffusion coefficient and any kind of "conductivity" $\sigma$. With the equation of continuity $$\frac{\partial n(x,t)}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial j(x,t)}{\partial x}=0$$

one gets the inhomogeneous equation $$\frac{\partial n(x,t)}{\partial t}-D \frac{\partial^2 j(x,t)}{\partial x^2}+\kappa=0$$ with a positive constant $\kappa$.

My only question is whether this reasoning is correct? If so, the rest would be solving the equation by standard method.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think you're missing the differential $\mathrm{d}$ on the flux term (i.e., $\mathrm{d}j/\mathrm{d}x$ instead of $j/\mathrm{d}x$). $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    Commented Apr 20, 2023 at 14:05

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Your result has something funny about it: $$\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}-D\color{red}{\frac{\partial j}{\partial x} }+\kappa=0 \tag{your result} $$ The $D$ and $\kappa$ both come from the definition of $j$, so you shouldn't have both of these values and the divergence of $\mathbf{j}$ in the result at the same time. Hence, you should be expecting something like $$\frac{\partial n}{\partial t}-D\color{blue}{\frac{\partial^2n}{\partial x^2}}+\kappa=0 \tag{expected result},$$ which has the diffusion term present.

The current density otherwise looks to be of the form of a drift-diffusion equation often seen in semiconductor physics.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the hint with the second derivative. I have to think again. I simply took the current density $j$ from the Drude model and replaced $E$ by $-\nabla \Phi$ and added this to the diffusion current $-D \nabla n$ which is perhaps too simple. But for now I want to leave this alone and write again when I am clearer. $\endgroup$
    – Cisfinite
    Commented Apr 20, 2023 at 19:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.