0
$\begingroup$

When we have an electric field interacting with a dielectric medium, the equation governing the macroscopic polarization is given by $\vec{P} = \alpha\vec{E}$. This equation seems to also be used when the field is due to an EM wave, so the equation might look like $\vec{E}(z,t) = E_0\sin(kz-wt)$. If we look at the example of a rectangular slab, it seems like if we inspect the displacement of electrons at different z values over a wavelength of the wave, we will have dipole moments that average to 0. For example, at $z=\pi/(2k), t=0$ the electric field will have amplitude $E_0$ but at $z=\pi/k, t = 0$ the field will have amplitude $-E_0$, so the dipole moments at those two places will always cancel. With this in mind, how do we arrive at a net dipole moment that isn't negligible for most solids, assuming that the only net dipole moment will result from some portion of the dielectric not being in a full period of the EM wave?

This question first occurred to me because someone mentioned to me that for EM waves incident on a plasma or certain solids, the scattered waves will all be in the same direction as the incident wave (or favor a certain direction) because of the phase interference for the free electrons (assuming the ions are fixed). I am not sure why the same effect wouldn't occur in a dielectric, or if I am misunderstanding the effect for plasmas in general. I would appreciate any clarifications or references to materials I can read.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

If the EM frequency $\omega$ is low enough so that the dipoles can track it then the latter behave roughly if they were in a static field, such "low" frequency can be all the way to optical. I do not think for X-rays one can define permittivity meaningfully.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer! To clarify if temporal frequency is low then wouldn't spatial frequency be high and we would get the cancellation I asked about due to the periodicity of the sin wave in space? $\endgroup$
    – safaroth2
    Commented Dec 10, 2022 at 18:00
  • $\begingroup$ spatial frequency is always monotonically increasing with frequency, so if $\omega$ is smaller then $\lambda$ is larger. $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Dec 10, 2022 at 18:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.