3
$\begingroup$

The Kerr metric have two killing vectors:

$$t^{\mu} \equiv (k_{t})^{\mu} = (1,0,0,0)\hspace{5mm} \mathrm{and}\hspace{5mm} \phi^{\mu} \equiv (k_{\phi})^{\mu} = (0,0,0,1). \tag{1}$$

In general, it is possible to construct another killing vector given by,

$$\chi^{\mu} = a t^{\mu} + b \phi^{\mu}. \tag{2}$$

It is well-known that in Kerr spacetime the general killing vector is when: $a=1$ and $b=\Omega =- \frac{g_{t\phi}}{g_{\phi \phi}}|_{H}$.

So, using the fact that a horizon is a null surface, then we could try to find $a$ and $b$ using:

$$\chi_{\mu}\chi^{\mu}=0. \tag{3}$$

but in the end of the day my calculation resulted in:

$$\chi_{\mu}\chi^{\mu}= g_{tt}a^{2}+g_{\phi\phi}b^{2}+2g_{t\phi}ab=0. \tag{4}$$

So, my question is:

Given the Kerr metric $[1]$, and the general linear combination of the Killing vectors $(2)$, how can I prove that $a=1$ and $b=\Omega =- \frac{g_{t\phi}}{g_{\phi \phi}}|_{H}$?(*)


$[1]$ Kerr geometry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr_metric

(*) It is possible to just define the well-known vector field $\chi^{\mu} = t^{\mu} + \Omega\phi^{\mu}$. You take it for granted and derive many important things. But at some point in black hole history someone faced the equation $(2)$ and by some kind of argument (a mathematical proof, say; or not) was stablished that the most interesting killing combination is when $a=1$ and $b=\Omega =- \frac{g_{t\phi}}{g_{\phi \phi}}|_{H}$, and that is the reasoning that I'm not grasping (in both physical and mathematical ways).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Do I have a déjà-vu or did you just repost a question you asked yesterday? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 2, 2022 at 7:18

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I believe you were almost there :)

If you consider that without loss of generality you can set a=1 (or, in alternative, you wanna ask yourself what is b going to look like with a set to 1) you then have a quadratic equation to solve for b. You will soon find out that both solutions coincide and they happen to be exactly $\Omega$:

$$ g_{\phi\phi}b^2+2g_{t\phi}b+g_{tt}=0 $$ then $$b_\pm = \frac{g_{t\phi}\pm\sqrt{g_{t\phi}^2-g_{tt}g_{\phi\phi}}}{g_{\phi\phi}} = \frac{g_{t\phi}\pm\sqrt{\Delta}\text{sin}\theta}{g_{\phi\phi}}$$ where $$\Delta = r^2+\alpha^2-2Mr = (r-r_+)(r-r_-)$$ and $r_+,\,r_-$ are the two horizons and $\alpha=J/M$, angular momentum over mass of the Kerr solution. Being on the horizon, the plus-minus term disappears and we're left with $$b=-\frac{g_{t\phi}}{g_{\phi\phi}}=\Omega_H$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.