2
$\begingroup$

What are the possible strategies of Dark Matter direct detection whenever we reach the neutrino floor/neutrino fog in a few years (months?)?

I have read about:

-Directional dark matter searches (also here).

-Neutrino sterile searches (can we detect what kind of neutrinos hit a Dark Matter detector?)

Any other? As I talked about this moment in my M.Sc. thesis 12 years ago, I wonder if beyond coherent-neutral neutrino-nuclei impostors, other scenarios to distinguish neutrinos from true dark matter are being considered and how.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not sure I e even heard the term neutrino floor. DUNE won't be online for quite a while and that's supposed to be the next big detector. $\endgroup$
    – Triatticus
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ @riemannium: What do you mean by "...beyond coherent-neutral neutrino-nuclei impostors..." The "impostors" word here? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 18:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I mean, if DM detectors can detect something else beyond that interaction that mimics the DM interaction with them... $\endgroup$
    – riemannium
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, got it thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 19:45

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The quick on the Neutrino Fog: Direct WIMP dark matter detectors are sensitive to nuclear recoils. Neutrinos can also induce nuclear recoils via coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEvNS). There is a point where the dark matter has just the right mass and cross-section such that the kinematics could induce a spectrum that looks just like that from some astrophysical neutrino source CEvNS (and vice versa). This was called the neutrino floor, but more accurately is now called a fog, since it's not a hard limit, but a fluffy bound that makes you slow down progress.

There are different astrophysical neutrino sources that are responsible for different parts of the so-called neutrino fog. The most accessible flux comes from solar boron-8 neutrinos. Those should be detected with the currently-ongoing LZ and XENONnT experiments in the coming year or three. Then there's the neutrino fog from atmospheric neutrinos, that's still a decade or so away.

Directional detection works in principle, since solar neutrinos come from the Sun, but dark matter comes from the direction of the constellation Cygnus. Problem there is the conflict between the need of very significant exposures to get the rate, and simultaneously, a highly instrumented or low-density target to pick up the directionality from the low-energy recoils. I would think of that as challenging-at-best for Solar neutrinos and unrealistic for atmospheric neutrinos.

Sterile neutrinos can increase the neutrino fog, as can other beyond-the-standard-model interactions. This would make the detection come earlier, but to disentangle what goes on would be a fun task for particle physics.

There is one really good way, and that is the multi-target approach. With different target materials, say xenon and argon or germanium, you can break the degeneracy, and disentangle whether the signal in your detectors comes from dark matter or from neutrinos. That underlines why it is so important to have multiple different dark matter experiments at the same time.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ DM coming from Cygnus is just an example, I mean...Isn't it? I mean, as far as we know, DM should be isotropic in principle, coming from any direction...Shouldn't it? $\endgroup$
    – riemannium
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 16:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Dark matter is isotropic in the Galactic frame of reference. But the Sun flies around the galaxy in the direction of Cygnus, so you would expect most dark matter to come from that direction. $\endgroup$
    – rfl
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 19:50
  • $\begingroup$ I have never heard about that...Cool...Any reference about this fact? $\endgroup$
    – riemannium
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 19:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The buzzword is "directional dark matter detection" $\endgroup$
    – rfl
    Commented Jul 8, 2022 at 20:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.