Given a bounded normal domain V, and a scalar potential $u(r_0)$, $r_0$ being a $3D$ position vector, the representation theorem for solutions to Poisson's equation states: $$u(r_0) = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \int_{\partial V} (\frac{1}{|r - r_0|} \frac{\partial u(r)}{\partial \nu} - u(r)\frac{\partial(\frac{1}{|r - r_0|})}{\partial \nu}) dS - \frac{1}{4\pi} \int_{V} \frac{\nabla^2 u(r)}{|r-r_0|} dV$$
Here, r is another $3D$ vector, the variable of integration. $\nu$ is the unit outward normal vector on the surface. This is a representation form for the solution of the Poisson equation as can be found in e.g, Zachmanoglou pg 191 theorem 5.1, or here pg 2, equation 4.3.
Now, let's say that $u(r_0)$ is an electrostatic potential. I want to understand the physical significance of the terms in this equation.
The volume integral term is the potential due to the volume charge density, which makes sense.
We see that if u is the electrostatic potential, $\frac{\partial u(r)}{\partial \nu} = \nabla u \cdot \nu$ is the normal part of the electric field at the surface of the region. By Gauss's law with $\epsilon_0 = 1$, the normal part of the electric field on the surface is equal to the surface charge density (Griffiths Electrodynamics) so that the term in $\frac{\partial u}{\partial \nu}$ is the potential due to the surface charges.
But then what is the $u(r)\frac{\partial(\frac{1}{|r - r_0|})}{\partial \nu}$ term supposed to be? It seems like the other two terms have already accounted for the necessary physical effects.