2
$\begingroup$

I am currently studying the textbook Microwave Engineering, fourth edition, by David Pozar. Chapter 1.3 FIELDS IN MEDIA AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS says the following:

If linear media are assumed ($\epsilon$, $\mu$ not depending on $\overline{E}$ or $\overline{H}$), then Maxwell's equations can be written in phasor form as $$\nabla \times \overline{E} = - j \omega \mu \overline{H} - \overline{M}, \tag{1.27a}$$ $$\nabla \times \overline{H} = j \omega \epsilon \overline{E} + \overline{J}, \tag{1.27b}$$ $$\nabla \cdot \overline{D} = \rho, \tag{1.27c}$$ $$\nabla \cdot \overline{B} = 0. \tag{1.27d}$$ The constitutive relations are $$\overline{D} = \epsilon \overline{E}, \tag{1.28a}$$ $$\overline{B} = \mu \overline{H}, \tag{1.28b}$$ where $\epsilon$ and $\mu$ may be complex and may be tensors. Note that relations like (1.28a) and (1.28b) generally cannot be written in time domain form, even for linear media, because of the possible phase shift between $\overline{D}$ and $\overline{E}$, or $\overline{B}$ and $\overline{H}$. The phasor representation accounts for this phase shift by the complex form of $\epsilon$ and $\mu$.

$\epsilon$ is the complex permittivity of the medium, and $\mu$ is the complex permeability of the medium.

I don't understand this part:

Note that relations like (1.28a) and (1.28b) generally cannot be written in time domain form, even for linear media, because of the possible phase shift between $\overline{D}$ and $\overline{E}$, or $\overline{B}$ and $\overline{H}$. The phasor representation accounts for this phase shift by the complex form of $\epsilon$ and $\mu$.

What exactly is this saying / what exactly does this mean?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Pozar is talking about a wide bandwidth case in which the frequency dependence of the dielectric permittivity $\epsilon = \epsilon(\omega)$ and/or magnetic permeability $\mu = \mu(\omega)$ cannot be ignored. While the equations Eq 1.27, 1.28 are still true for pure sinusoidal excitation as written it is not true in the time domain. For that you have to calculate the (inverse) Fourier Transform of $\epsilon = \epsilon(\omega)$, say $\tilde \epsilon = \tilde \epsilon(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \epsilon(\omega) e^{\mathfrak {j} \omega t}d\omega/(2\pi)$ and then you get the time-domain convolution $$ \tilde D (t)= \tilde \epsilon(t) \otimes \tilde E (t)$$ where $\tilde E (t) = \bar E (t)\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \epsilon(\omega) e^{\mathfrak {j} \omega t}d\omega/(2\pi) $

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. 1. So, basically, equations 1.27 and 1.28 cannot be written as functions of time in this "wide bandwidth" case/regime? 2. But how does the phase, which is repeatedly mentioned by the author, come into this? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 22:23
  • $\begingroup$ the vectors $\bar D, \bar E, ...$ are complex quantities, phasors, e.g., $\hat E = \bar E e^{\mathfrak j \omega t}$ and $E(t)=\Re[\hat E] = |\bar E| cos(\omega t +\phi)$ where $\bar E = |\bar E| e^{\mathfrak j \phi}$. $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 22:35
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, ok; so I see where the phase is. But if the phasors can be written as functions of time, then what exactly is meant by "cannot be written in time domain form"? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ Full sentence: Without a convolution integral "cannot be written in time domain form". $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 22:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.