0
$\begingroup$

I understand that, in the particular case of a constant force $F$ applied to an object, the speed increases linearly, both the instantaneous power $P$ and the kinetic energy also increase linearly.

Often, we deal with the situation in which power $P$ is set to be constant and we hear that if the force $F$ is large the speed $v$ is low and vice versa. Even if this makes sense mathematically, I have to admit that it is still does not make full sense conceptually.

Constant power $P$ means that we supply the object with energy at a constant rate (ex: say 2 Joule every second). Why would a large force imply a small velocity and vice versa?

I think that the underlying assumptions are:

a) the net power is zero: a constant positive input power that injects energy in the system per unit time is matched by a constant negative power (due to resistive forces) that removes an equal amount of energy from the system

b) The speed is constant since the net power is zero and there is not kinetic energy change

I just cannot wrap my head around the idea that when the object moves at small constant speed $v$ the force $F$ on it is large and vice versa. I am stuck with thinking that a large force has to correlate with a large speed.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "the speed increases linearly, both the instantaneous power P and the kinetic energy also increase linearly." This wouldn't be possible. the kinetic energy depends quadratically on the speed, so the speed can't be changing both linearly and quadratically at the same time. $\endgroup$
    – Steeven
    Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, the change in KE is linear. That is what I meant. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 1:18

4 Answers 4

3
$\begingroup$

$\rm power = force \times velocity$ so if the power is constant a large force implies a small velocity.

The power equation comes from $\rm work \,\,done = force \times displacement$ and dividing both sides of the equation by $\rm time$.
So if a body is travelling fast it undergoes a large displacement per second and so to keep the power at some constant value the force must be small.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I see. Your reply is clear. If the displacement is small over a second, the speed would be low and the force would be large. I get that must be the case to keep power constant. But why does a large force not manage to increase to speed to a larger value and acts on the body while it only moves slowly? Is it simply because the force I am discussing is perfectly matched by another opposing force? Both forces produce equal and constant amounts of power but opposite in sign. The net power must be zero.... $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 1:29
3
$\begingroup$

Constant power 𝑃 means that we supply the object with energy at a constant rate (ex: say 2 Joule every second). Why would a large force imply a small velocity and vice versa?

The engine can't cause velocity. All it can do is supply a force. This relation (assuming it holds) tells us that a constant power engine can only provide small forces at high velocity. We can't pick both the power and the force.

Remember we don't need a large force to travel quickly. A small force over time can do that if drag is small. Forces cause changes in velocity, not velocity itself.

So, say we start from rest with our car in low gear (1s gear) pressing the gas pedal all the way. The car speeds up (i.e. accelerates, changes velocity). What happens if we don't shift and stay in the 1st low gear? Does the car reach a constant speed for the 1st gear because the force on the ground is matched by the net resistive force? I don't think the car speeds up any further...Why?

You can keep accelerating for a while, but normally you don't want to because of damage to the engine. But if your engine can't blow up, you'll accelerate until your RPMs get so high that the power output of the engine drops. Above a certain point, the engine can no longer deliver much force. When this happens, it's balanced against the sources of drag and the acceleration stops.

For a simpler scenario, imagine a merry-go-round. While it's stopped, you can push pretty hard on it. Your force is able to accelerate it quite rapidly. As it goes faster, you can no longer push as hard. The same thing happens in any moving system. As the velocity increases, the force you can develop to push it decreases.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. So, say we start from rest with our car in low gear (1s gear) pressing the gas pedal all the way. The car speeds up (i.e. accelerates, changes velocity). What happens if we don't shift and stay in the 1st low gear? Does the car reach a constant speed for the 1st gear because the force on the ground is matched by the net resistive force? I don't think the car speeds up any further...Why? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 2:37
3
$\begingroup$

Just a short answer but maybe this helps:
Your question is equivalent to asking why kinetic energy $E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2$ increases with $v^2$ instead of $v$ because $dE/dt=ma\cdot v=P$. So the amount of energy needed to increase the velocity of an object $dv$ at high velocities is greater than it is for small velocities because $dE(v)=mv\cdot dv$. Vice versa this means that the power for a given force (that tells you how much the object changes its velocity per time unit) is greater at high velocities because $dE/dt=P=Fv$.
This is kind of a circular argument but usually one does not question the fact that kinetic energy increases with $v^2$ (which also simply follows from $F=ma$ and $dE:=F\cdot ds$) and maybe you are more used to this.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I think the confusion is treating everything constant between power, force, and velocity, but this isn't possible.

If power is constant, then $P=Fv\to F=P/v$, meaning $F$ is a monotonically decreasing function of $v$. So when $v$ is "small", $F$ is "large". This causes an acceleration, which increases $v$ and decreases $F$. Note that this has to happen for constant power. There are no other forces present. You have said the power is constant for this process (whatever it is), and so the force has to be a function of $v$ as $F=P/v$.

If it helps, you can work out the velocity as a function of time in the case of a constant power:

$$F=\frac Pv=m\frac{\text dv}{\text dt}$$ $$\int_{v_0}^{v}v'\,\text dv'=\int_0^t\frac Pm\,\text dt'$$ $$\frac12\left(v^2-v_0^2\right)=\frac Pmt$$ $$v(t)=\sqrt{\frac{2P}{m}t+v_0^2}$$

And we can determine the force as well

$$F(t)=m\frac{\text dv}{\text dt}=\frac{P}{\sqrt{(2P/m)t+v_0^2}}$$

which is just $P/v$ as we come full circle.

So as you can see, over time the velocity increases and the force decreases in such a way that the power is constant. No other forces or $0$ net power is needed to explain this. Note that all of the above assumes a positive power.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ thanks @BioPhysicist. I am be starting to get it. Constant power $P$ means providing the body energy at a constant rate. If power is constant ( ex: body gets 2 J every second), the force we apply to the body must change and be inversely proportional to the instantaneous speed $v$ of the body: $F= \frac {P} {v}$. Say the body starts with $v=0$, the force must be initially very large (technically infinite) and decreases as the speed $v$ increases (which it does). The work done by the force remains constant: the force decreases but it gets applied to a larger displacement during each second.... $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 14:44
  • $\begingroup$ @BrettCooper Yep, that is correct :) $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ My recent comment considers the body speed to change, KE increasing while power is constant. However, the common case of the body moving at constant speed (bike in low gear and cyclist pedaling) implies zero net work, zero net power and multiple (2 or more) forces acting on the body each producing equal amounts of power (oppositely signed). The cyclist manages to generate constant input power power. The net resistive force creates an equal amount of power. The propulsive force by the wheel on the ground, the net resistive force would be constant forces (the power and speed are constant) $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 14:59
  • $\begingroup$ @BrettCooper Yes, that is a scenario you can consider. I fail to see the point of your above comment though. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @BiPhysicist, I know, that has been my frustrating thought: a bike moving at a constant speed and with constant input power. The applied force $F$ is also constant. And if $v$ is small, $F$ must be large. The "coexistence" of a constant large force with a constant speed has been bothering me. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 23, 2021 at 16:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.