2
$\begingroup$

I've currently trying to learn electromagnetism in depth and I tried to solve the Biot-Savart law, for a magnetic field generated by a current. $$ \vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \int{\frac{I \; \hat{r} \times \mathrm{d} \vec{\ell}}{r^2}} $$ When I looked up for information on how to solve the equation, there are always simplifications, like: $$ B = \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \int{\frac{I \; \mathrm{d} \ell \sin{\theta}}{r^2}} \rightarrow B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi R} $$

Edit: It is possible to solve this integral in a vectorial form and without the need of simplification for the magnetic field in a straight wire carrying a current? Would you be able to arrive to a solution similar to the one of the electric field generated by an electric current in a straight wire $\frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \varepsilon_0 r} \hat{r}$ (which you arrive using Gauss's law)?

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is the example you want to solve it for? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2021 at 23:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For deriving the magnetic field expression in a vectorial form, in a similar way of the electric field $E = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{Q}{r^2} \hat{r}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2021 at 23:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah sorry, let me clarify the post. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2021 at 23:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related : (1) A generalization of the Biot-Savart law. (2) Magnetic field due to a single moving charge. See equation (02) in the first link. $\endgroup$
    – Voulkos
    Commented Nov 18, 2021 at 23:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm still a bit confused by the question. As far as I'm concerned, the Biot-Savart law is the solution - if you provide the current density $\mathbf J$ everywhere in space, then you just integrate it as per Biot-Savart to obtain the magnetic field (assuming that the conditions for Biot-Savart to be applicable are satisfied). Of course, for all but the simplest current configurations the integral will not have a nice closed form, but it's unclear what else you are looking for beyond the explicit formula for $\mathbf B$ which you've provided. $\endgroup$
    – J. Murray
    Commented Nov 19, 2021 at 1:36

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

What about:

$$d \vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0 I d \vec{\ell} \times \vec{r}}{4 \pi r^3}$$

or

$$d \vec{B} = \frac{\mu_0 I d \vec{\ell} \times \hat{r}}{4 \pi r^2}$$

$B$ = magnetic flux density; $I$ = current in wire; $\ell$ = length of wire; $r$ = distance of a point in the field to a segment of the wire; $\mu_0$ = magnetic permeability of free space.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.