1
$\begingroup$

If I have some time-dependent interaction Hamiltonian $H_I(\tau)$, with the interaction beginning in the asymptotic past ($\tau$$\rightarrow$$-\infty$) and ending in the asymptotic future ($\tau$$\rightarrow$$\infty$), then the first two terms in the Dyson series will read:

\begin{equation} U=U^{(1)}+U^{(2)}+\cdots \end{equation}

where

\begin{equation} U^{(1)}=-i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\tau H_I(\tau) \end{equation} \begin{equation} U^{(2)}=-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\tau\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\tau'\Theta(\tau-\tau')H_I(\tau)H_I(\tau'). \end{equation}

The interaction Hamiltonian is Hermitian $H_I^{\dagger}(\tau)=H_I(\tau)$. I want to calculate the first two terms of the series expansion of $U^{\dagger}$. I know that

\begin{equation} U^{(1)\dagger}=i\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\tau H_I(\tau). \end{equation}

My question is, when I write down $U^{(2)\dagger}$, do I reverse the time ordering (i.e, replace $\Theta(\tau-\tau')$ with $\Theta(\tau'-\tau)$), and write down

\begin{equation} U^{(2)\dagger}=-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\tau\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\tau'\Theta(\tau'-\tau)H_I(\tau)H_I(\tau'), \end{equation}

or do I simply keep the term the same (since there is no factor of $i$. and the Hamiltonians are already Hermitian)?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Technically, when computing the hermitian conjugate of your $U^{(2)}$, you should leave the integration variables unchanged and only swap the Hamiltonians since $$(A B)^\dagger = B^\dagger A^\dagger,$$ and $H$ is assumed to be hermitian. You could then relabel $\tau_1 \leftrightarrow \tau_2$ to explicitly see that this is not equivalent to simply exchanging $\tau_1$ with $\tau_2$: $$\left(\int_0^\infty d\tau_1 \int_0^{\tau_1} d \tau_2 H(\tau_1) H(\tau_2) \right)^\dagger = \int_0^\infty d\tau_1 \int_0^{\tau_1} d \tau_2 H(\tau_2) H(\tau_1) = \int_0^\infty d\tau_2 \int_0^{\tau_2} d \tau_1 H(\tau_1) H(\tau_2).$$

A highly recommended exercise is to use your series expansion to second order to explicitly show that $U^\dagger U = 1$, where it will be helpful to think about the limits of integration as the triangular areas obtained when dividing the first quadrant of the coordinate space $(\tau_1,\tau_2)$ by the line $\tau_1 = \tau_2$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.