2
$\begingroup$

When we set up Hartree-Fock equations for atoms we work with the following Hamiltonian:

$\displaystyle{H=\sum_{i,j}a_i^\dagger \langle i|T|j\rangle a_j+\sum_{i,j} a_i^\dagger \langle i|U|j\rangle a_j +\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i,j,k,m}\langle i,j|V|k,m\rangle a_i^\dagger a_j^\dagger a_m a_k}$

Where Schwabl (Advanced Quantum Mechanics) says that $U$ is the potential the electrons feel due to the nucleus and $V$ is the Coulomb interaction. And here my question arises because well, both $U$ and $V$ are described by Coulomb interaction so, why $U$ term (electron-nucleus interaction) is treated as a single-particle operator and not as a two-particle operator as the case of $V$?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It's because the Hamiltonian does not contain the kinetic energy of the nucleus, so U functions as an external potential. You could include the kinetic energy of the nucleus, but then you have an extra degree of freedom associated with free particle motion of the whole atom.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It might be useful to point out that this is known in literature as the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2021 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ This is related with the distinction between coupling and interaction? $\endgroup$
    – Saoirse
    Commented Jul 14, 2021 at 4:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.