2
$\begingroup$

In the Hartree-Fock treatment of the interacting electron gas it is assumed that solutions are planewaves of the form \begin{equation} \phi_{i}^{HF} = \phi_{{\bf{k}}\lambda} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Omega}}e^{i{\bf{k}}{\bf{r}}}\chi_{\lambda} \end{equation} where $\chi_{\lambda}$ is the spin function for spin up $\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}$ and spin down $\begin{pmatrix}0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$. I am trying to understand the proof that the planewave functions are solutions to the self-consistent Hartree-Fock equations, which for the jellium model are reduced to \begin{equation} -\frac{\hbar}{2m}\nabla^{2}\phi({\bf{r}}, \sigma) + \sum_{\sigma'}\int V_{x}({\bf{r}}, {\bf{r'}}, \sigma, \sigma')\phi_{i}({\bf{r}'}, \sigma') d{\bf{r'}} = \epsilon_{i}\phi_{i}({\bf{r}}, \sigma) \end{equation} where \begin{equation} V_{x}({\bf{r}}, {\bf{r'}}, \sigma, \sigma') = - \sum_{j}^{occ} \frac{e^{2}}{|{\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}}|}\phi_{j}^{*}({\bf{r'}}, \sigma')\phi_{j}({\bf{r}}, \sigma) \end{equation} Substituting the planewave solutions to the equation \begin{equation} \frac{\hbar^{2}k^{2}}{2m} \phi_{{\bf{k}}\lambda}({\bf{r}}) - \frac{1}{\Omega^{3/2}}\sum_{k'< k_{F}}\sum_{\lambda'}\int d{\bf{r'}}\frac{e^2}{|{\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}}|}e^{-i{\bf{k'r'}}}e^{-i{\bf{k'r}}}e^{-i{\bf{kr'}}}\delta_{\lambda' \lambda}\chi_{\lambda} = \epsilon_{\lambda}({\bf{k}})\phi_{{\bf{k}}\lambda}({\bf{r}}) \end{equation} Assuming a paramagnetic electron gas, i.e. equal occupation of ${\bf{k}}$ spin up and ${\bf{k}}$ spin down orbitals the exchange term (second term on the left-hand side) can be simplified \begin{equation} -\frac{1}{\Omega}\sum_{k' < k_{F}} \int d{\bf{r'}}\frac{e^2}{|{\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}}|} e^{-i({\bf{k}}-{\bf{k'}})({\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}})}\phi_{{\bf{k}}\lambda}({\bf{r}})=\\ = \bigg( -\frac{1}{\Omega} \sum_{k' < k_{F}} \frac{4\pi e^{2}}{|{\bf{k}} - {\bf{k'}}|^{2}}\bigg)\phi_{{\bf{k}}\lambda}({\bf{r}}) \end{equation}

I am confused about the final step, as I am trying to integrate the expression with respect to $\bf{r'}$, but getting $\Gamma(0, i[({\bf{k}} - {\bf{k'}})({\bf{r}} - {\bf{r'}})])$ as a result. Could you please help me understand how the derivation in the last step is done? Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ What is $\Gamma$? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2, 2021 at 11:57
  • $\begingroup$ The gamma function $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2, 2021 at 14:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You might be further interested in this physics SE thread. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 3, 2021 at 8:35

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

My best guess is that since for, $$\int d{\bf{r'}}\frac{e^2}{|{\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}}|} e^{-i({\bf{k}}-{\bf{k'}})\cdot ({\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}})}$$ the integral is carried out over $\bf{r'}$ everything else is essentially fixed when we integrate, so lets make the substitution $\bf{w} = {\bf{r'}}- {\bf{r}}$ and $\bf{z} = {\bf{k'}}- {\bf{k}}$, $$\int d{\bf{w}}\frac{e^2}{|\bf{w}|} e^{-i\bf{z}\cdot\bf{w}}$$ this is now simply the Fourier transform of the coulomb potential. The full derivation of that Fourier transform is quite long but here is a good example I found https://blog.cupcakephysics.com/electromagnetism/math%20methods/2014/10/04/the-fourier-transform-of-the-coulomb-potential.html, anyway we get.

$$\int d{\bf{w}}\frac{e^2}{|\bf{w}|} e^{-i\bf{z}\cdot\bf{w}} = \frac{4\pi e^{2}}{\vert \bf{z} \vert^{2}} = \frac{4\pi e^{2}}{\vert {\bf{k}}- {\bf{k'}} \vert^{2}}$$

and therefore.

$$\int d{\bf{r'}}\frac{e^2}{|{\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}}|} e^{-i({\bf{k}}-{\bf{k'}})\cdot ({\bf{r}}- {\bf{r'}})} = \frac{4\pi e^{2}}{\vert {\bf{k}}- {\bf{k'}} \vert^{2}}$$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I don't know whether this is (completely) mathematical rigorous, but intuitively I'd say that the last equality can be derived by noting that $$ -\Delta_\mathbf{r} \, \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}^\prime|} = 4\pi\,\delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}^\prime) \quad $$

and performing a Fourier transformation on both sides.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.