(I am not a cosmologist and instead currently working on a master thesis about Feynman integrals, so sorry if I'm missing something obvious. This question is merely out of interest.)
I was wondering whether there are people working on Higgs cosmology and if they are not, then why are they not? Is there some clear prediction which contradicts observations? I have seen a lot of theories mentioned with 'dark matter coupled to Higgs', but rarely that Higgs itself could be dark matter.
For clarity, with 'Higgs cosmology' I'm referring to the following idea I have encountered a few times in conversation but never seen in my Cosmology course or in media like Wikipedia:
- The Higgs particle has a vacuum expectation (after symmetry breaking etc.) but also has interactions with mass. Therefore, the actual value of the Higgs field in the neighbourhood of mass may differ significantly from the vacuum expectation.
- This means that near large masses (e.g. a star) one would expect the Higgs field to have a significantly different expectation depending on the distance from the star, becoming the vacuum expectation in the large-distance limit.
- This means that stars could have an effective 'halo' from the Higgs field. If this halo is short-range one would not expect any cosmological relevance, but if it is sufficiently long-ranged it will have effect as follows.
- Two nearby stars will both have a halo, so now the interactions are not only star -- star (gravity) but also halo -- star, star -- halo and halo -- halo. The halo -- star attraction might contribute to dark matter, while the halo -- halo interaction is even more unclear and might provide a very long-range force hence either contributing or working against dark energy.
(One remark: If the halo is indeed sufficiently long-ranged then the results from CERN have to be taken a bit more nuanced, for the setup at CERN can make a matter-vacuum and make it dark, but can not avoid being inside the Higgs-halo of all the matter nearby.)
Again, I am not a cosmologist so I wouldn't notice gaping holes in the theory. Could someone please explain why this theory is not popular?