4
$\begingroup$

The case $\lambda=1$ is well known free field kernel. What about $\lambda$ in between 0 and 1 ?? ... for $\lambda>1$ I have a proof that the kernel is not reflection positive , but for $\lambda<1$ there is the so called fractional Brownian motion representation of the corresponding semigroup describing the fractional diffusion generalized ( if space dimension is greater zero ) processes..

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ ,corr. the kernel is ( p ^2 + M ^2 )^ (-lambda) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 18, 2020 at 7:55

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Good question, about something which is not very well known.

For $\lambda=0$, the two-point function is a delta function and the random field corresponding to the Euclidean functional integral is called white noise. The model is trivially reflection positive, i.e., this is a free (Gaussian) unitary QFT, albeit an ultralocal one which is not very interesting.

For $0<\lambda<1$, the model is also reflection positive, i.e., this is a unitary Euclidean QFT, often called a generalized free field.

The reason for this unitarity property is that one has a convergent integral representation $$ \frac{1}{(p^2+m^2)^{\lambda}}= \frac{1}{C_{\lambda}}\times \int\limits_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{p^2+m^2+u}\times \frac{du}{u^{\lambda}} $$ where $$ C_{\lambda}=\int\limits_{0}^{\infty}\frac{du}{u^{\lambda}(u+1)}\ . $$ The above formula is an explicit Källén-Lehmann representation. So, reflection positivity for the fractional case $0<\lambda<1$ follows, by continuous superposition, from the reflection positivity for the usual case $\lambda=1$. For more details, see Theorem 7.1 of the article "A PDE construction of the Euclidean $\Phi_{3}^{4}$ quantum field theory" by Gubinelli and Hofmanová.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for pointing out the paper by Gubinelli and Hofmanowa-indeed this is something like Lehman-Kallen representation of the ( Euclidean -time e )Wightman two-point function $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2020 at 7:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.