1
$\begingroup$

The usual definition of radiation energy density in the context of statistical physics is given by $$U=a_{B}T^{4}$$

With $a_{B}=7.5657\times 10^{-16} J m^{-3} K^{-4}$. So $U$ has units of $J m^{-3}$

On the other hand I read in some General relativity textbooks that the parameter $\rho$ (the parameter that appears in the Friedmann equations) is the energy density, but if I look at the units in the of the Friedmann equation for the Hubble parameter

$$H^{2}=\frac{8 \pi G }{3}\rho$$

I find that $\rho$ has units of $kg/m^3$. So in the particular case of radiation $\rho_{r}$ don't have the same units as $U$, then $\rho_{r}$ is not the energy density of radiation?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

In astrophysics and cosmology it is common to omit factors of $c$, where $c$ is the speed of light. This means that in these units an energy density will look like a mass density. To fix this, you have to put in a factor $c^2$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I know that the correct relation is $U=c^{2}\rho_{r}$, but I was looking for some reference. However your answer makes more clear my problem, thank you. $\endgroup$
    – Nothing
    Commented May 28, 2020 at 5:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.