2
$\begingroup$

My understanding of colour is that atoms in a particular object will absorb certain wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation, and the scattered wavelengths give the object its colour. The absorbed wavelengths contribute to lattice vibrations, increasing the kinetic energy and raising the objects temperature. Is this correct?

What is the sequence of events when a solution of particular atoms is sprayed through a Bunsen burner? I don't understand this. In this case is the colour seen a result of electrons moving up and then back down energy levels?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

In Bunsen burner atoms get heated up which means they absorb energy, and go to some excited states (or even get ionized). And then they de-excite in any way they can which means radiative decay is dominant, as there is almost no other way to dissipate energy. There is no crystal lattice, and compared to luminescence rate collisions are infrequent.

So yes - colour observed in Bunsen burner is related to electronic transitions.

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

Your coloured object is absorbing light, i.e. light is changing into mechanical energy, while the atoms in the Bunsen burner are emitting light, i.e. mechanical energy is changing into light.

If you have, for example, sodium atoms in a flame those atoms are continuously colliding with air molecules. The velocities of the air molecules are a function of temperature and are described by the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. At typical flame temperatures the average energies of gas molecules are well below the energies of electronic transitions in sodium, however the Maxwell-Boltzann distribution has a tail of very high velocities. The small percentage of gas molecules with high energies can collide with the sodium atoms hard enough to excite their electrons into a higher energy state. The atoms then relax and emit photons by spontaneous emission.

So in the flame the emission of the light is cooling the flame by turning the mechnical energy of the gas molecules into light. As you correctly say in your first paragraph, when light is absorbed it causes electronic transitions in the solid and these then transfer their energy into mechanical energy of the solid thereby heating it. The two processes are opposites of each other.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Brilliant. That's just the explanation I was looking for. Thank you. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 19, 2013 at 10:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.