1
$\begingroup$

I have this situation. A conducting metal sphere of radius $a$ and charge $Q$, surrounded by a dieletric shell with inner radius $a$ and outern radius $b$.

If I try to evaluate the induced charge density $\rho_b$, in the region $a<r<b$ is it correct to say that I should get these results? $$ \vec{E}(a<r<b)=\vec{D}/\epsilon=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2} $$ So, considering thath $\vec{P}=\epsilon_0\chi\vec{E}$ $$ \rho_b = -\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{P} = -\frac{\epsilon_0\chi Q}{4\pi\epsilon}\vec{\nabla}\cdot\bigg(\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}\bigg)= \frac{\epsilon_0\chi Q}{2\pi\epsilon}\frac{1}{r^3} $$ My question is here because I found the solution for $\rho_b$ to be 0 on a textbook. Am I missing something?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You made a mistake at the last step. It is wrong to say $$\nabla\cdot \left(\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}\right)=-2\frac{1}{r^3}$$

Divergence of inverse square radial vector field is trickier than simple 1D differentiation.

You need to use the fact that

$$\nabla\cdot \left(\frac{\hat{r}}{r^2}\right)=\delta^3(0),$$ where $\delta^3(0)$ is the Dirac delta function centered at the origin (i.e. infinity at origin, and zero everywhere else). As the dielectric layer does not extends to the origin, so $\rho_b=0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot. I missed this fact. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 16, 2020 at 17:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.