Consider the amplitude $$Z=\big\langle 0\big|\exp\big(-\frac{iHT}{\hbar}\big)\big|0\big\rangle.$$ This is same as $$Z=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dq\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dq^\prime\langle 0|q^\prime\rangle\langle q^\prime|e^{-iHT/\hbar}|q\rangle\langle q|0\rangle=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dq\int\limits_{-\infty}^{+\infty}dq^\prime~ \phi^*_0(q^\prime)\phi_0(q)K(q,t;q^\prime,t^\prime)$$ where $\phi_0(q)$ is the position space wavefunction for the ground state $|0\rangle$ evaluated at $q$ and $$K(q,t;q^\prime,t^\prime)\equiv \langle q^\prime|e^{-iHT/\hbar}|q\rangle=\int_{q(t)=q}^{q(t^\prime)=q^\prime} Dq(t) \exp\Big[i\int_0^Tdt(\frac{1}{2}m\dot{q}^2-V(q)\Big].$$ This integral has informations about the ground state i.e., we need the ground state wavefunction to evaluate this.
But $Z$ has an alternative expression in terms of a path-integral as $$Z=\int Dq(t) \exp\Big[\frac{i}{\hbar}\int_0^Tdt(\frac{1}{2}m\dot{q}^2-V(q)\Big].$$ Unlike the first expression of $Z$, from the second expression has anything to do with the ground state or knows about the ground state. I find it amusing that the second relation apparently oblivious to the ground state?
Is there any boundary condition for $q(0)$ and $q(T)$ in $\int Dq(t)$? This is not clear. Now, we are not evaluating $\big\langle q_i\big|\exp\big(-\frac{iHT}{\hbar}\big)\big|q_f\big\rangle$. So I see no reason of fixing anything.
It is possible to derive the second relation from the first or the first relation from the second?
Is there a similar path integral expression for $\big\langle f\big|\exp\big(-\frac{iHT}{\hbar}\big)\big|i\big\rangle$ where $i$ and $f$ are arbitrary initial or final state?