# Why do we have redundant degrees of freedom?

Preliminaries: Consider the homogenous Maxwell's equations

$$\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu}=0.$$

and

$$\partial_{\sigma} F_{\mu \nu}+\partial_{\mu} F_{\nu \sigma}+\partial_{\nu} F_{\sigma \mu}=0$$

Since $$F^{\mu\nu}$$ is antisymmetric there are a total of $$\frac{16-4}{2} =6$$ DOFs, all of which are physical.

Now, let us introduce a gauge potential $$A_\mu$$ so that

$$F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu$$

which also has 6 DOFs, and also leave the Maxwell equations invariant under a suitable transformation of $$A_\mu$$. However, we regard some of them as non-physical.

Question: Is my counting of degrees of freedom correct? If not, then where do these "extra" number of degrees arise in introducing the gauge potential $$A_\mu$$? If my counting is correct, then why are there redundant DOFs in $$\partial_{[\mu}A_{\nu]}$$ but not $$F_{\mu\nu}$$?

## 1 Answer

There aren't six degrees of freedom in the electromagnetic field, no matter how you write it. There are just six properties of the field that are easy to measure ($$E_x$$, $$E_y$$, $$E_z$$, $$B_x$$, $$B_y$$, and $$B_z$$). Similarly, a wave on a horizontal string has one degree of freedom, its height, even though one can measure its kinetic energy density, potential energy density, vertical velocity, and more.

The general way of counting degrees of freedom is to go to a Lagrangian formulation and look at the dimension of its configuration space, minus constraints and gauge freedom. But a trick that works for free fields is to just see how many numbers are needed to describe each mode of the field; this works even if you're not using the actual degrees of freedom (the $$A_\mu$$).

For example, the modes of the electromagnetic field are plane waves. You can use Maxwell's equations to show that $$E = c B$$ and $$\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B} \propto \mathbf{k}$$. So for each wavenumber $$\mathbf{k}$$ there are only two things you fix to determine what the plane wave is, e.g. the magnitude of the electric field and the polarization.

• i see what you're saying in the second paragraph.. For free EM, we start with 6 and then maxwells equations give us 4 more constraints leaving us with 2 DOFs. This doesn't still help me figure out how to count the gauge DOFs added by introducing $A_\mu$ – InertialObserver Jul 19 at 19:55
• @InertialObserver I wouldn't phrase it that way -- it's more like the $A_\mu$ are the true DOFs the whole time, and the counting is $4 - 2 = 2$. The $E$ and $B$ fields are secondary things that you can define in terms of them that happen to be useful, but they aren't the primary objects. Nonetheless, you can still do the counting (as $6 - 4 = 2$), just not as naturally, since $E$ and $B$ aren't the DOFs in the Lagrangian. – knzhou Jul 19 at 20:02
• I see.. so we start with 4 DOFs, which for free EM waves is 2 redundant ones. To get the wave equations for E B we need to fix a gauge, which in turn removes 2 DOFs. It’s not obvious to me, however, that fixing a gauge will always lead to the correct physical DOFs – InertialObserver Jul 19 at 20:08
• In an electromagnetic wave there are 5 degrees of freedom. The amplitude, the polarisation and the three components of $\vec k$. The sixth degree of freedom is the Coulomb potential. – my2cts Jul 19 at 22:34