In plenty of the qualitative thermodynamics that predates the statistical description, temperature is assumed to always be positive; many key inequalities related to the second law often involve multiplying or dividing by temperature without changing the sign which would only be valid were temperature always positive (the description of 'Availability' on p168 of Blundell & Blundell is what has brought this question up).
I am aware that the second law is more 'properly' viewed as a result of statistical mechanics, and the classical assumption of infinitely many energy states is what leads to strictly positive temperature. Is there any way to see this without reference to statistics?
I know there are plenty of questions here about negative temperature, but I don't think this is a duplicate (sorry if it is).