0
$\begingroup$

My eighth-grade physics teacher taught us that the equation for height ($h$) during a free fall in a vacuum is equal to the initial height ($H_0$) minus a constant ($G$, though not the $9.8$ meters per second we know and love) multiplied by time ($t$) squared, divided by $2$.
However, $dh\over dt$ is velocity ($v$), and $dv\over dt$ is acceleration ($a$). If acceleration were constant, then his formula would be fine. But acceleration is not constant. It's $G\over h^2$. So if acceleration changes, then the velocity is not a perfect quadratic equation, meaning the equation he taught us is wrong. Presumably he was dumbing it down for $13$-year-olds.

What is the actual equation? How could you arrive at it? I tried setting up a second-order differential equation, but got stuck on $$dh = G\int {1\over h^2}dt dt$$ In order to solve this problem I would need to express $h$ in terms of $t$, which is the very problem I am trying to solve. How does one get around this? I am in Calc BC, so I would love for a step-by-step solution.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ physics.stackexchange.com/q/184377 $\endgroup$
    – BowlOfRed
    Commented May 1, 2019 at 19:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You might want to reconsider the meaning of your product $dt\,dt$ in the integral. $\endgroup$ Commented May 1, 2019 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/3534/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented May 1, 2019 at 19:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic I think you closed this as the wrong dupe. This seems to be about how the force/accceleration varies with height due to gravity's change due to height; not so much about the gravity exerted between objects. $\endgroup$
    – JMac
    Commented May 1, 2019 at 19:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice try. Can you fill in the gaps that leads to your integral? Something is wrong there, but I can't tell what without the steps. $\endgroup$
    – garyp
    Commented May 1, 2019 at 19:49

0