0
$\begingroup$

I have a fundamental misunderstanding about the definition of magnetic force as arises from Lorenz force: $F = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}$. According to a basic fact of electromagnetism, electric currents are the source of magnetic fields, and a single moving charge can be viewed as a current. Therefore, in a situation of one moving charge and another stationary charge, the moving charge creates a magnetic field, but by the Lorenz definition of magnetic force, the force experienced by the stationary charge iz zero (since it's velocity is zero). But if we shift to a frame of reference moving at half the speed ($\frac{{v}}{{2}}$) of the first charge and in the same direction, we get one charge moving in a speed $+\frac{{v}}{{2}}$ and a second charge moving at $-\frac{{v}}{{2}}$. In this scenario, the magnetic force experienced by the same charge is not zero.

So what exactly am i missing? i view it as a serious bug in my fundamental understanding of electromagnetism, and i will be extremely thankful if someone will complete for me the picture of charge-charge electromagnetic interaction.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The magnetic field and electric field should also be transformed. And charge densities in a conductor change because of length contraction. I am sure there are answers on this site. $\endgroup$
    – user137289
    Commented Apr 9, 2019 at 8:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This should help physics.stackexchange.com/questions/65335/… $\endgroup$
    – user227513
    Commented Apr 9, 2019 at 10:14
  • $\begingroup$ You keep using the term "electromagnetism". Why do you think these have been combined? It isn't just because they both deal with charged particles. It is because they are intimately linked through special relativity. When you change reference frames the fields change too. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 15:31
  • $\begingroup$ You may want to read Einstein original article about this: fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2019 at 21:46

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Actually what you said is all correct. Magnetism and electricity are not independent things, they should always be taken together as one complete electromagnetic field. In one frame you have only an electric field. Whether or not you see an magnetic field depends on your reference frame, but if you would apply both the effects of the magnetic and electric field in that frame to another particle, it will result in the same motion as in the first frame.

I suggest you read The Feynman Lectures Vol. II 13-6, he gives a more comprehensible explanation than I ever could.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.