1
$\begingroup$

In Quantum Chromodynamics, when we take the limit in which the u, d and s quarks have no mass, there exists a global symmetry $G \equiv SU(3)_L \otimes SU(3)_R$ in flavour space. The corresponding Noether currents to this symmetry are given by

$$ J_X^{a,\mu} = \bar{q}_X \gamma^\mu T^a q_X \quad \text{where} \quad X = L,R $$

In the current, $q_X$ is the left- or right-handed quark field, $\gamma^\mu$ are the Dirac matrices and $T^a$ are the generators of $SU(3) in the fundamental representation.

And y have to prove that the Noether charges $Q_X^a = \int d^3x J_X^{a,0}(x)$ satisfy the commutation relation

$$ \left[Q_X^a, Q_Y^b \right] = i \delta_{XY} f^{abc} Q_X^c $$

The problem is that in order to demonstrate the commutation relation I know that I have to start by using

$$ \left[q(x) \mathcal{O} q(x) . q^\dagger (y) \mathcal{O}' q(y) \right] = q^\dagger (x) \left[ \mathcal{O} , \mathcal{O}' \right] q(x) \delta^{(4)}(x-y) $$

and I have no clue of how to demonstrate that relation, except for that I need the anticommutation relations of the quark fields.

Thanks for your attention. I’m looking forward to your reply.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The commutation you are trying to prove is simply wrong for X,Y being L,R. L and R's commute--that is the point of the Cartesian product group you wrote. It is only that when Y=L+R. You surely know the rules of computing commutators of bilinear entities given the commutators of the linear entities. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. I made a mistake writing the expression. Thank you for noting it. Now it is edited. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 10, 2018 at 20:20

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Just expand the commutator using the identity

\begin{equation} [AB,CD] = -AC\{D,B\}+A\{B,C\}D-C\{A,D\}B+\{C,A\}DB. \end{equation}

It should be easy with that. But take into account that you are only interested in the commutation relations of the fields, not with the ones of the operator $\mathcal{O}$ (it has nothing to do with color, flavor and so on), so write down the matrix indices and take the operator out of the commutator.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.