3
$\begingroup$

I'm asked to prove that the fractional change of density of a fluid ($\frac{\Delta\rho}{\rho_0}$) is so that $$\frac{\Delta\rho}{\rho_0}=-\beta\,\Delta{T},$$ where $\beta$ is the volumetric coefficient of expansion and given that $\Delta{V}=\beta\,V_0\,\Delta{T}$. However, my attempt at a solution, which starts from $\Delta{\rho}$:

$$ \Delta{\rho}=m\,\left[\frac{1}{V_0+V_0\,\beta\,\Delta{T}}-\frac{1}{V_0}\right]=\frac{-\beta\,\Delta{T}}{1+\beta\,\Delta{T}}\,\rho_0 \implies\frac{\Delta\rho}{\rho_0}=\frac{-\beta\,\Delta{T}}{1+\beta\,\Delta{T}}. $$ ends up in something different. Did I do something wrong? or is it the problem that's poorly written?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Your analysis is not wrong. Note that the general definition of the coefficient of expansion is $\beta \equiv \frac{1}{V} \frac{dV}{dT}$; so when you write it as $\beta \simeq \frac{1}{V} \frac{\Delta V}{\Delta T}$, you're implicitly assuming that the temperature variation $\Delta T$, and hence $\Delta V/V$ is small${}^*$.

With that in mind, using $\Delta V = \beta V \Delta T$, your final equation can be rewritten as: $$\frac{\Delta \rho}{\rho_0} = - \frac{\beta \Delta T}{1+\Delta{V}/V}$$ As mentioned previously, the change in volume due to expansion is much less than the initial volume of the object so $\Delta V/V << 1$, meaning that you can neglect $\Delta V/V$ in the denomenator in comparison with $1$; resulting in: $$\frac{\Delta \rho}{\rho}\simeq-\beta \Delta T$$


* To be more precise, from the definition of $\beta$ we have: $$\frac {dV}{V}=\beta dT$$ so: $$\int_{V_1}^{V_2}\frac {dV}{V}=\int_{T_1}^{T_2}\beta dT$$ Now provided that the temperature variation $\Delta T = T_2 - T_1$ is sufficiently small so that we can neglect the variations of $\beta$ in the $[T_1,T_2]$ interval, $\beta$ (and $V$) can be approximately pulled out of the integral, resulting in: $$\frac{\Delta V}{V} \simeq \beta \Delta T$$ which is the formula you were using.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Note that you can also rearrange the definition of $\beta$ in terms of the density $\rho=\frac m V$ to get that approximation:

$$\beta \equiv \frac{1}{V}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T}\right)_{p} = \frac{1}{m / \rho}\left(\frac{\partial (\frac {m}{\rho})}{\partial T}\right)_{p} = \frac {\rho}{m}\left(-\frac{m}{\rho^2}\right)\left(\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial T}\right)_{p}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\left(\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial T}\right)_{p}$$

So

$$\beta \simeq-\frac{1}{\rho} \frac{\Delta \rho}{\Delta T} \implies \frac{\Delta\rho}{\rho}=-\beta\,\Delta{T}$$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! It was during a course where one-variable calculus wasn't an option though, so partial derivatives wouldn't have even been an option :( $\endgroup$
    – condosz
    Commented Dec 7, 2021 at 11:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.