1
$\begingroup$

Given the integral:

$I = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{2n}e^{-\alpha x^2} dx$

If I say that if:

$$[I] = [L]^{2n+1}$$

And the dimensions of alpha must be $\frac{1}{[L]^2}$ since the exponent must be dimensionless

Then the integral must scale with $[\alpha]^{-n+1}$ since

$$[\alpha] = [x]^{-2}=[L]^{-2}$$ $$[\alpha]^{-n} = [L]^{2n}$$ $$[\alpha]^{-n+1} = [L]^{2n+1}$$ $$[\alpha]^{-n+1} = [I]$$

but If I do u substitution, then I get something like:

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{2n}e^{-\alpha x^2} dx $$ $$= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x x^{2n-1}e^{-\alpha x^2} dx$$

using:

$$u = -\alpha x^2$$ $$du = -2\alpha x dx$$

i get:

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{-2 \alpha} \left(\sqrt{\frac{-u}{\alpha}}\right)^{2n-1}e^{u} du$$

edit: fixed algebra error below:

so the integral is proportional to

$$\alpha^{-1}(\alpha^{-1/2})^{2n-1} = \alpha^{-n-\frac{1}{2}}$$

Is there something wrong with the first method? How do you infer how the integral varies with alpha from dimensional analysis without u substitution here?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why $\alpha^{-1}$? Your final expression has $\alpha^{-(n+1/2)}$, which coincides with the dimensional analysis answer after you fix your algebra error: $[L]^{2n+1}= [\alpha]^{-n-1/2}$ $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ @mikestone I agree with you, but $[L]^{2n+1}=[\alpha]^{-n+1}$ according to the initial work, so is there still another error? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 22:30
  • $\begingroup$ I'ved fixed the algebra error in the second part. It's off by 1/2 in the exponent $\endgroup$
    – jacob
    Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 22:40
  • $\begingroup$ I think you have an issue with doing your initial dimensional analysis. I think the issue comes into play when you add $1$ to the exponents on both sides. I don't think this is valid. I am typing up an answer now. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 22:46

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The problem is that you are treating the units $[\alpha]$ and $[L]$ like equivalent "variables", when they are not. For example, let's say the units of $[L]$ are meters and the units of $[\alpha]$ are something, say $a$. Then: $$1\space a=1\space m^{-2}$$ $$1\space a^2=1\space m^{-4}$$ $$1\space a^3=1\space m^{-6}$$

So you can see, adding $1$ to the units of $\alpha$ subtracts $2$ from the units of $L$. But in arriving at the line $[\alpha]^{-n+1}=[L]^{2n+1}$ you did something similar by adding one to both sides.

To relate this to normal algebra without thinking about units, this is similar to saying if $x^2 = y$, then $x^3=y^2$, which is not the case. The correct thing to do is $x^3=xy=y^{3/2}$

Therefore, we see that for every $1$ we add to the exponent of $[\alpha]$, we must subtract $2$ to the exponent of $[L]$. This is the fix we need. Except we want to subtract $1/2$ from $[\alpha]$ and then subsequently add $1$ to $[L]$. This is essentially the same thing as saying either "multiply both sides by $[\alpha]^{-1/2}$" or "multiply both sides by $[L]$", and then using the relation $[\alpha]=[L]^{-2}$ to only deal with $[\alpha]$ or $[L]$ on each corresponding side.

$$[\alpha]^{-n}=[L]^{2n}$$ $$[\alpha]^{-n-1/2}=[L]^{2n+1}=[I]$$

Your work at the end of your question gets to this exact conclusion.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ ahh I see. So the correct power to raise alpha and $L^{-2}$ would have been $-(n+\frac{1}{2})$ $\endgroup$
    – jacob
    Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 23:07
  • $\begingroup$ @jacob Yes that would be a shorter way to do it without getting into all of this. But look at what all we learned :) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 13, 2018 at 23:16

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.