The problem read as follows,

Consider an infinite cylinder (in $z$) and with external radius also infinite. In the cylinder flows a current defined by a superficial current density given by:

$$J(r, \theta) = \frac{J_{0} R^2}{r^2}\cos(\theta) \qquad \left[\text{with unit }\frac{\rm A}{\rm m^2}\right]$$

Evaluate the $x$ and $y$ components of the magnetic field in point $P$.

The schematic is, wire geometry

Here are my attempts:

If I get the idea correctly, there is no current flowing in the inside wire, i.e., $r \leq R$, only for $r > R$.

I have drawn an amperian loop $\mathscr{C}$ with radius $r$, such that $r > R$ and applied Ampere's Law to it.

$$\nabla \times \vec{H} = \vec{J}$$ $$\oint_\mathscr{C} \vec{H} \cdot d\vec{l} = \int_S \vec{J} \cdot d\vec{S}$$

$$I_\text{enclosed} \equiv \int_S \vec{J} \cdot d\vec{S}$$.

Ok, so changing to polar coordinates, we will have $dS = r\ dr\ d\theta$. If I define $d\vec{S}$ outwards the cross section as is $\vec{J}$, we get

$$I_\text{enclosed} \equiv \int_S J dS = \int \int \frac{J_{0} R^2}{r^2}\cos(\theta)\cdot r\ dr\ d\theta$$

Here's the issue: should I integrate $r$ for $R < r < +\infty$? If so, then the integral diverges. Should I integrate $\theta$ for $0 < \theta < 2 \pi$? Then the magnetic field is null, which is inconsistent, since in that region there is a current enclosed by the Amperian loop.


Neat problem. In the spirit of our homework policy I'm going to try to give you an answer that addresses your conceptual issue without depriving you of finding your own solution to the problem.

Note that your current distribution has a "supply" current where $0<|\theta|<\frac{2\pi}4$ and an opposing "return" current on the other side of the cylinder. That current distribution has a different set of symmetries than your Amperian loop that's a circle at constant $r$, so unlike in the straight-wire case, you can't assume that $\oint \vec H \cdot d\vec\ell = 0$ corresponds to $\vec H = 0$. Your circle has rotational symmetry, but your current distribution has reflection (anti-)symmetry about the $x$- and $y$-axes. That suggests that sections of the curves $x=0$ and $y=0$ would be interesting to include as segments in your Amperian loop.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.