0
$\begingroup$

I see different definitions in different places so here is my question.

why is $\gamma^{0}$ sometimes defined as a 2 by 2 matrix and sometimes as a 4 by 4 matrix? shouldn't a definition be something that does not change?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean perhaps a $2\times 2$ matrix of a $2 \times 2$ matrix (making it actually $4\times 4$)? Sometimes that's the way it is displayed in textbooks. $\endgroup$
    – JamalS
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ I have 1 in the first element of the first row and -1 on the last element of the last row. It dosen't say that it is something different than 1. however, do you mean it is definitely always as a 4 by 4 matrix? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 12:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is as I suspected, here 1 means the 2 by 2 identity matrix. $\endgroup$
    – JamalS
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 13:18

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

This is just the very common block matrix notation. When you see

$$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$$

you should interpret this as

$$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} I_{2\times 2} & 0_{2\times 2} \\ 0_{2\times 2} & -I_{2\times 2} \end{pmatrix}, $$

where $I_{2\times 2}$ and $0_{2\times 2}$ are the $2\times 2$ identity and zero matrices. Written out in full the matrix would be

$$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}.$$

There are two things going on here, really. One is that physicists like to write the identity matrix as $1$ instead of $I$, and the other is the block matrix notation, where it is assumed that you know from context that $\gamma^0$ should be a $4 \times 4$ matrix. Many times we don't even write the zero matrices, so that you could even see

$$\gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & \\ & -1 \end{pmatrix}$$

being used! You just have to know from context that this is supposed to be a $4 \times 4$ matrix, and the $1$'s are $2 \times 2$ identities.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Great answer Javier- thanks! Well explained. This should clear up any confusion surrounding the use of 1 vs 𝐼. Just to clarify for any other readers, the "implied" matrix (read across rows) 𝛾^0=(𝐼_2×2, 0_2×2, 0_2×2, 𝐼_2×2) should in fact be 𝛾^0=(𝐼_2×2, 0_2×2, 0_2×2, -𝐼_2×2); the -𝐼 is what contributes to the two -1s that you see at 𝛾^0_3,3 and 𝛾^0_4,4. hope this helps! $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2022 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ @FrederikPusch edited, thanks for the correction. $\endgroup$
    – Javier
    Commented Mar 21, 2022 at 21:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.