4
$\begingroup$

On the Wikipedia page for Matsubara frequencies, the following formula is presented, $$ \sum_{i\omega_n} \frac{(i\omega_n)^2}{(i\omega_n)^2 - \xi^2} = -\frac{\xi}{2}\Big(1 - 2 N_{\text{FD}}(\xi)\Big), $$ where $\omega_n = (2n+1)\pi/\beta$ are fermionic Matsubara frequencies and $N_{\text{FD}}(x):= (e^{\beta x}+1)^{-1}$ is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function.

I am familiar with the residue theorem and I can derive `easier' results involving Matsubara summations. However, in this case I don't see how to derive the result. I guess it is necessary to include the usual converging factor $e^{i\omega_n\eta}$ with $\eta\rightarrow0$ at the end of the computation, otherwise the sum would not even converge. Any help or reference would be appreciated.

The reason I am asking this, is because I actually want to evaluate a Matsubara sum of the form $$ \sum_{i\omega_n} \frac{(i\omega_n)^2}{(i\omega_n - \xi_1)(i\omega_n - \xi_ 2)}. $$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

It turns out I was overlooking something obvious. My reasoning was: there are two poles located at $i\omega_n = \pm \xi$, how come there is only a Fermi-Dirac distribution evaluated at one pole? Using the identity $N_{\text{FD}}(-x) = 1 - N_{\text{FD}}(x)$ solves this problem. Indicating the usual steps by dots (going to the complex plane; closing the contour appropriately etc.), one obtains

\begin{align} \sum_{i\omega_n} \frac{(i\omega_n)^2}{(i\omega_n)^2 - \xi^2} &= \sum_{i\omega_n} \frac{(i\omega_n)^2}{(i\omega_n - \xi)(i\omega_n + \xi)} \\ &=\dots \\ &=\frac{\xi^2}{2\xi}N_{\text{FD}}(\xi)+\frac{\xi^2}{-2\xi}N_{\text{FD}}(-\xi) \\ &=-\frac{\xi}{2}\Big(1 - 2 N_{\text{FD}}(\xi)\Big) \end{align}

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.