Let's take a direction eigenket $|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle$ in 3-dimensional space oriented with angles $\theta\in\left[0,\pi\right]$ and $\phi\in\left[0,2\pi\right]$ in spherical coordinates. Next take the $|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle$ direction eigenket.

There are infinite rotations which take $|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle$ to $|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle$, but in particular we can consider a specific rotation given by the following operator (Wigner D-Matrix) written with Euler angles $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$:

\begin{align} &\mathcal{D}(R)=\mathcal{D}(\alpha=\phi,\beta=\theta,\gamma=0)\\ &\implies|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle=\mathcal{D}(R)|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle \end{align}

Notice that if we change the value of $\gamma$ the equation remains valid (because $\gamma$ represents a rotation about ${\bf \hat{n}}$ axis). This is the same notation that appears on Sakurai and Wikipedia. Next it is shown a relation with spherical harmonics (from Sakurai & Napolitano, sec. 3.6 pp 205-206):

\begin{align} &|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle=\mathcal{D}(R)|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle\\ \implies &|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle=\sum_{l',m'}\mathcal{D}(R)|l',m'\rangle\langle l',m'|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle\\ \implies \langle l,m &|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle=\langle l,m|\sum_{l',m'}\mathcal{D}(R)|l',m'\rangle\langle l',m'|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle\\ \text{Using that}&\ \text{$\mathcal{D}(R)$ doesn't change the $l'$ number:}\\ \implies Y_{l}^{m*}(\theta,\phi)&=\sum_{m'}\langle l,m|\mathcal{D}(R)|l,m'\rangle\langle l,m'|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle\\ \implies Y_{l}^{m*}(\theta,\phi)&=\sum_{m'}\mathcal{D}^{(l)}_{m,m'}(R) Y_l^{m'}(\theta=0,\phi)\\ \text{And using that}&\ \text{$Y_l^{m'}$ vanishes at $\theta=0$ for $m'\neq 0$:}\\ \implies Y_{l}^{m*}(\theta,\phi)&=\sqrt{\frac{2l+1}{4\pi}}\mathcal{D}^{(l)}_{m,0}(R)\\ \end{align}

This gives a relation between the rotation operator $\mathcal{D}(R)$ and spherical harmonics. It does not seem in any step of the derivation that $\gamma=0$ is necessary. I think that if we choose another rotation $R$ with $\gamma\neq 0$ such that $|{\bf\hat{n}}\rangle=\mathcal{D}(R)|{\bf\hat{z}}\rangle$ the relation remains valid, but this is weird because if $R$ changes then the operator $\mathcal{D}(R)$ changes (and $Y_l^{m*}$ doesn't change).

My question is: Why the spherical harmonics represent rotations with $\gamma=0$ and not another value? and, if we have a rotation with $\gamma\neq 0$, can we write it with spherical harmonics?

  • $\begingroup$ I do not understand your final equation: $\mathcal{D}$ is an operator acting on spherical harmonics, how can it be equal to a spherical harmonic itself? That's like saying a matrix is equal to a vector, which is nonsensical. Why does the l.h.s. of your equation depend on $\theta$ and $\phi$ and the r.h.s. does not (another mathematical impossiblity, all sides of an equation must have the same number of free variables)? $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Oct 4 '17 at 10:40
  • $\begingroup$ $\mathcal{D}$ is not equal to a spherical harmonic, but its elements of the first column $\mathcal{D}_{m,0}^{(l)}$ are spherical harmonics. And $(\theta,\phi)$ are fixed because ${\bf \hat{n}}$ is fixed $\endgroup$ – adiselann Oct 4 '17 at 15:54

The simplest explanation starts by writing explicitly the first Euler rotation about the $\boldsymbol{\hat z}$ as $$ R_z(\gamma)= \left(\begin{array}{ccc} \cos\gamma&\sin\gamma & 0 \\ -\sin\gamma &\cos\gamma &0 \\ 0&0&1 \end{array} \right) $$ Clearly $$ R_z(\gamma)\hat z = R_z(\gamma) \left(\begin{array}{c} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{array}\right)= \left(\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{array}\right) $$ independent of the angle $\gamma$. Thus, your function must also be independent of $\gamma$; this is achieved by setting $\gamma=0$.

[By the way this rotation by $\gamma$ is about $\boldsymbol{\hat z}$, not ${\boldsymbol{\hat n}}$.]


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.