0
$\begingroup$

When I looked at the BRST symmetry in Yang-Mills-Theories I was puzzled by the statement:

Suppose we go back to canonical quantisation with a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$. The BRST symmetry leads to an associated operator $Q$ acting on $\mathcal{H}$.

As far as I understood it, the problem we have with Yang-Mills theories is that we cannot find a Hilbert space (since we cannot have a positive-definite norm) and that the Hilbert space actually is the cohomology space defined by $\mathcal{H_{phys}} = Ker(Q)/Im(Q)$

So the question, is the starting space really a Hilbert space as stated in the quote above?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Indeed, the space the BRST operator initially acts on is not a "Hilbert space" in the strict meaning of the word since there are negative- and null-norm states in that space. Something like "pseudo-inner product space" would be more accurate.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.