I am interested in the behavior of the proper volume when we switch the frame of reference. For example, I know that the proper volume element for the Schwarzschild and Kerr black holes may be extracted easily from the formulae:

$V=\sqrt{g}dr d\theta d\phi = \frac{r^{5/2} \sin (\theta )}{\sqrt{r-2 m}}$

(Where we only picked the spatial components of the $g_{\mu \nu}$ for the determinant)

However, I am interested in seeing how this proper volume changes when according to different observers. For example, I know that the local frame of reference can be expressed with a tetrad:

$e^m_\mu=\left( \begin{array}{cccc} \sqrt{\frac{r-2 m}{r}} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \sqrt{\frac{r^2}{r^2-2 m r}} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \sqrt{r^2} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \sqrt{r^2} \sin (\theta ) \\ \end{array} \right)$

Which fulfills: $e_{c}{}^{b} e_{e}{}^{d} g_{bd} = \eta_{c e}$ (the tetrad transformation into the local frame of reference)

Now I am interested in finding out what the proper volume $V_{\rm local}$ is in this local frame of reference given by the tetrad. Is this possible?


Well, to calculate volumes, you need a hypersurface.

Let $\Sigma$ be such a hypersurface, locally described as $$ x^\mu=\Phi^\mu(\xi), $$ where $\xi=(\xi^1,\xi^2,\xi^3)$ are local coordinates on the hypersurface. Let us assume $\Sigma$ is spacelike, since that's what you seem to be going for.

The induced metric is then positive definite and is given by $$\gamma_{ij}=g_{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial\Phi^\mu}{\partial\xi^i}\frac{\partial\Phi^\nu}{\partial\xi^j},$$

the volume element is then $$d\Sigma=\sqrt{\det\gamma}d^3\xi.$$

Let $e_{(a)}=\{e_{1},e_{2},e_{3}\}$ be an orthonormal frame on $\Sigma$, so we have $$ \delta_{ab}=\gamma_{ij}e^i_{(a)}e^j_{(b)}, $$taking the determinant of both sides gives $$ 1=\det\gamma\cdot(\det e)^2, \\ \sqrt{\det\gamma}=\det(e^{-1}), $$ is we denote the dual frame with $\theta^{(a)}=\theta^{(a)}_id\xi^i$ (we have $e^i_{(a)}\theta^{(b)}_i=\delta^b_a$), we have $$\sqrt{\det\gamma}=\det\theta,$$ so the volume element is $$ d\Sigma=\det\theta d^3\xi. $$

  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see, so in this case the proper volume would be: $d\Sigma = det (e_m^\mu)^-1 dx dy dz=r^2 \sin (\theta ) \sqrt{\frac{r}{r-2 m}} dx dy dz$? Just to confirm I understood it properly. $\endgroup$ – Otto Mar 7 '17 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ Nevermind, I got it now! For clarification to others it may be helpful to note how I repeated the above derivation: We have $d\xi^m=e^m_{\ \ \mu} dx^\mu$, and if we set $dx^0=0$, we get the above result for $d^3 \xi=\sqrt{det\gamma}^{-1} dx^1 dx^2dx^3$ $\endgroup$ – Otto May 7 '17 at 8:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.