0
$\begingroup$

At this Wikipedia page, we've that the 'Transformer universal EMF equation' looks like:

$$\text{E}_{\text{rms}}=\frac{2\pi\times\text{f}\times\text{n}\times\text{a}\times\text{B}_{\text{peak}}}{\sqrt{2}}\approx4.44\times\text{f}\times\text{n}\times\text{a}\times\text{B}_{\text{peak}}$$

In this question there is a picture that derives the EMF equation but it does not is the same as the one that is stated at wikipedia (which is supposed to be the EMF-equation):

$$\overline{\epsilon}_\text{p}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\times\text{N}_\text{p}\times\frac{\mu_0\times\text{A}_\text{c}}{\mathcal{l}_\text{c}}\times\frac{\hat{\text{u}}_\text{p}\times\omega}{\sqrt{\Re_\text{m}^2+\left(\omega\times\text{L}_\text{p}\right)^2}}$$

Question: Why does those not equal eachother, where am I wrong?


Picture:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The $E_{ems}$ formula stands as written in the Wikipedia article. I might be wrong, but from the looks of it, this seems like induced EMS of primary winding.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ So, my question remains, what do I wrong in my derivation? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 28, 2017 at 16:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.