# Newton's Law of Cooling as boundary condition to Heat Equation

I am reading a book on Partial Differential Equations, and they derived the 1 spatial dimension heat equation from scratch (using a rod as an exmaple with end points at $x=0$ and $x=L$) and then gave a couple possible boundary conditions with appropriate physical explanations of each. One boundary condition they used was Newtons Law of Cooling, expressed with this notation: $$-u_x (0;t) = h(T_e - u(0;t))$$ $$u_x (L;t) = h(T_e - u(L;t))$$ Where $u(x;t)$ is the temperature as a function of space and time, $u_x (x;t)$ denotes the partial derivative with respect to $x$, $T_e$ is the external temperature, and $h$ is a positive constant of proportionality.

I'm okay with the rate of change needing to be opposite signs for the two ends, as positive Flux is pointing in different directions on the two faces, but I feel as though the signs should be switched as they presented them. They stated:

"if $T_e$ is less than the endpoint temperature, then $u(0;t)>T_e$ and the rate of change will be negative, so that we may expect the heat to flow into the he rod from the hehe exterior$. Mathematically, by the given equation, if$u(0;t) > T_e$, then$u_x (0;t)>0$, which would seem to imply the heat is flowing in ( I would think ), but physically, I dont see how this is possible. Wouldn't there want to be an equilibrium between the rod's end and the external temperature? This, to me, would suggest that heat would need to flow out of the rod, as the temperature is lower outside. I may be missing something vital here, and I would love an explanation!! • Your notation is not quite right. In general,$T_e$will have different values at each end of the rod. For example think about the rod with one end in boiling water and the other end in ice. If$T_e$was the same at each end, then you are right that nothing very interesting happens - the whole rod is at temperature$T_e\$ and there is no heat flow! – alephzero Jan 8 '17 at 7:56 