5
$\begingroup$

The two dimensional square lattice Ising model reads $$E[\sigma]=-J\displaystyle\sum_{<ij>}\sigma_i\sigma_j-h\displaystyle\sum_i\sigma_i,$$

where $E$ is the energy, $\sigma_i$ is the spin at lattice position $i$, each taking the value $1$ or $-1$ and $J$, $h$ are coupling constants. Now there is a statement (see Conformal Field Theory by Di Francesco etc., pp.63) that the case $J>0$ is equivalent to that of $J<0$ when $h=0$. How to understand that?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ 1. Always explain your notation! Although one can guess what $E[\sigma]$ and the $\sigma_i$ are, it's not stated anywhere within the post. What does $\sum_{<ij>}$ mean? 2. "there is a statement" - where is that statement? Who made it? $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented Sep 16, 2016 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind, I am soryy. I will modify my post. $\endgroup$
    – Wein Eld
    Commented Sep 16, 2016 at 15:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This really only works for bipartite lattices, a statement you never make in your question. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 16, 2016 at 15:13
  • $\begingroup$ @NorbertSchuch I think you mean ``$\sigma_i$ is the spin at lattice position $i$, each taking the value $1$ or $-1$'', right? $\endgroup$
    – Wein Eld
    Commented Sep 16, 2016 at 15:17
  • $\begingroup$ No, I mean that what you say is e.g. not true on a triangular lattice, but only on square, honeycomb, ... $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 16, 2016 at 15:28

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

See, e.g., http://physweb.bgu.ac.il/COURSES/StatMechCohen/ExercisesPool/EXERCISES/ex_5721_sol_Y12.pdf . You can divide your lattice in two lattices (the same way as a chess board is divided into white and black "lattices" and, say, replace $s_i$ by $-s_i$ for the "black lattice".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.