0
$\begingroup$

I'm studying the hydrogen atom from a quantum mechanics perspective, but I'm having troubles understanding a step.

Consider the stationary Schroedinger equation: $$\hat H \psi = E\psi$$

Let $M$ be the mass of the nucleus, and $m$ the mass of the electron. Then the reduced mass is $$\mu = \frac{mM}{m + M} \approx m$$

Hence Hamiltonian can be written as $$\hat H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 + P(\vec r) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^2 - \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$$ where $\nabla^2$ is the Laplace operator and $Z$ is the atomic number, so it should be $1$. The next step is the one I fail to understand. Since the potential has spherical symmetry, we change to spherical coordinates. The Hamiltonian is then $$\hat H = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\underbrace{\left(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2} + \frac2r\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\right)}_{\nabla^2} + \underbrace{\frac{\hat L^2}{2mr^2}}_{\text{??}} - \frac{Ze^2}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 r}$$ where $\hat L$ is the angular momentum operator. This passage comes with no explanation whatsoever. Here is what I have trouble understanding:

  1. How can I derive the new expression for $\nabla^2$ in spherical coordinates?
  2. Why is the angular momentum appearing?
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Item #3 looks like a typo, but since you didn't give a reference for where the last equation came from there's absolutely no way for anyone reading this to tell. Whenever you ask a question, put yourself in the position of your audience and make sure the question can be answered without having to read your mind :-) $\endgroup$ – DanielSank Jan 18 '16 at 9:05
  • $\begingroup$ $4\pi \epsilon_0 = 1$ in atomic units. So that could explain it, except that $\hbar=1$ also in atomic units, so maybe the units are just wrong, or at least confusing. Your underbrace ?? is the angular part of kinetic energy operator. Your underbrace $\nabla^2$ is the radial part of the kinetic energy operator. That is convenient, because spherical harmonics are the eigenfunctions of L^2, and whole expression can be made angle independent. $\endgroup$ – Mikael Kuisma Jan 18 '16 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielSank I crosschecked this and it is indeed a typo. I'm correcting the question. I don't have a title because it is material provided by the professor. $\endgroup$ – rubik Jan 18 '16 at 9:18
  • $\begingroup$ @MikaelKuisma But why is the angular momentum appearing only after the change in coordinates? Shouldn't the hamiltonian include that in cartesian coordinates as well? $\endgroup$ – rubik Jan 18 '16 at 9:20
  • $\begingroup$ You can find this in books about quantum mechanics. A. Messiah "Quantum Mechanics" is a nice reference. $\endgroup$ – Urgje Jan 18 '16 at 9:55
3
$\begingroup$
  1. Deriving the expression of the Laplace operator in spherical coordinates: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=chem_educ

  2. The angular momentum operator comes from gathering the angular parts $ (\theta, \phi) $ of the Laplace Operator:
    $$ {1 \over r^2 \sin \theta} {\partial \over \partial \theta} \left(\sin \theta {\partial \over \partial \theta} \right) + {1 \over r^2 \sin^2 \theta} {\partial^2 \over \partial \phi^2}. $$

In addition if you assume spherical harmonic solutions, you find: $\hat{L}^2 = l (l+1) \hat{1} $ as the operator equality when acting on the spherical harmonics. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_spherically_symmetric_potential).

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The last statement is slightly misleading, $\hat{L}^2\neq\ell(\ell+1)$. However, $\hat{L}^2Y_{\ell,m}=\ell(\ell+1)Y_{\ell,m}$ (with $\hbar=1$ in both). $\endgroup$ – Kyle Kanos Jan 18 '16 at 12:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.