8
$\begingroup$

Given a space of states $|\rangle$, $|x\rangle$, $|x,y\rangle$, with the creation operators such as $\hat{\phi}(x)|y,z\rangle=|x,y,z\rangle$ for creating a particle at position $x$ and so on.

How does this relate to path integrals?

e.g.

$$\Delta(x,0;y,t) = \int \phi(x,0)\phi(y,t) \exp(i S[\phi] ) D\phi$$

How do we get this using creation and annihilation operators?

I tried setting $|\rangle = \Psi_0[\phi]$ for some ground state but $a^+(x)\Psi_0[\phi] \neq \phi(x)\Psi_0[\phi]$ so then I got stuck. Also because then I'd end up with the ground state inside the path integral which wouldn't right.

Edit

Let me clarify a bit.

Say you have a wave functional $\Psi[\phi,t]$ which satisfies the second quantized Shrodinger equation:

$$ i\frac{d}{dt}\Psi[\phi,t] = \left(-\frac{\delta^2}{\delta\phi(x)^2}-\nabla \phi(x)^2 +m^2\phi(x)^2\right) \Psi[\phi,t]$$

and it has a ground state of the form:

$$ \Psi_0[\phi] = \exp\left( \int \phi(x)s(x-y)\phi(y) \right)$$

This is the vacuum state $|>$

Now I want to find the Feynman propagator. So I want something like:

$$\Delta(x,0;y,t) = \int \Psi[\phi_0]\Phi[\phi_t] \exp(i S[\phi] ) D\phi$$

for some particular wave functionals. But I want to find the one particle states to put in. If I set $\Psi[\phi_t] = \phi_t(x)\Psi_0[\phi_t]$ for example then I get the ground state inside the integral which is not what I want. Is it correct to expand the wave functional as:

$$\Psi[\phi,t] = \left(\psi_t + \int \psi_t(x)\phi(x)dx^3 + \int \psi_t(x,y)\phi(x)\phi(y) dx^3 dy^3+...\right)\Psi_0[\phi]$$

where the terms correspond to the states $|x,y,..;t>$. Or should I be using operators like $a^+(x)$ where the hamiltonian is:

$$H=\int\{a^+(x),a^-(x)\}dx^3$$

and

$$a^\pm(x) = \frac{\delta}{\delta \phi(x)} \pm \int s(x-y) \phi(y) dy^3$$

Whichever way I look at it I always end up with the ground state in the integral instead of just: $$\Delta(x,0;y,t) = \int \phi(x,0)\phi(y,t) \exp(i S[\phi] ) D\phi$$

See here it is just $\phi(x)$ not $\phi(x)\Psi_0[\phi] =\hat{\phi}(x)|>$. What am I doing wrong? How can I get rid of the ground state from the integral?

Edit 2

The only thing I can think of is that the ground state is not the same as the no-particle state. If the no-particle state is $\Psi_{NP}[\phi]=const$ then I think this solves it. Is this true or is the no-particle state equal to the ground state? But in that case what do the operators $a^\pm(x)$ correspond to? Do they mean excitations in the field as opposed to creation of particles?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ First of all $a,a^{\dagger}$ create and destroy particles with momentum $k$, no details on the position are given: $a^{\dagger}|0\rangle=|k\rangle$. However, quantisation in terms of creation and annihilation operators in only possible in some special (linear) cases. The path integral approach is the general one and, by definition, one cannot retrieve $a,a^{\dagger}$ back. Correlation functions, though, are expectation values on the vacuum, and in this respect you may use either ways to compute them, comparing them both. $\endgroup$ – gented Oct 11 '15 at 16:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are no $\lvert x,y,z; t\rangle$ states because QFT doesn't really have a position operator. The one-particle states are usually momentum states, or superpositions thereof. What is $\Delta(x,0,y,t)$ supposed to be? I also have no idea what $\Psi[\phi_t] = \phi_t(x)\Psi_0[\phi_t]$ is supposed to mean, given that the r.h.s. depends on $x$ (and is thus not a functional of a field configuration) but the l.h.s. does not. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Oct 11 '15 at 19:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\Delta(x,0,y,t)$ is the Feynman propagator to get from (x,0) to (y,t). I don't see your objection to the equation. The equation $x=3$ is valid even though the RHS doesn't depend on $x$. Also, you can Fourier transform any momentum states to position states. I don't know what you mean there are no states of this form. $|x,y>$ is the amplitude of finding particles both at x and y. It is symmetric for bosons and anti-symmetric for fermions. $\endgroup$ – zooby Oct 11 '15 at 19:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is no such thing. You can't Fourier transform momentum states into position states because QFT doesn't have a position operator. This is not QM where we have two operators $x,p$ with canonical commutation relations. We have the (four-)momentum operator, but there is no position operator in QFT, see this answer and this answer. What you are trying to do is ill-defined. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Oct 11 '15 at 20:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Those are states in quantum mechanics, not in quantum field theory. $\endgroup$ – ACuriousMind Oct 11 '15 at 20:17
1
$\begingroup$

I have looked at this. Which seems to give more of a clue.

The ground state can be written as:

$$<0|\phi> = \int\limits^{\eta_0=\phi}e^{i S[\eta]} D\eta $$

The transition function can be written as:

$$<\phi|U(t,t')|\psi> = \int\limits^{\eta_t=\phi}_{\eta_{t'}=\psi}e^{i S[\eta]} D\eta $$

So:

$$D(x-y) = <0|\phi_0(x)\phi_t(y)|0> = <0|\phi_t>\phi_t(x)<\phi_t|U(t,t')|\phi_{t'}>\phi(y)<\phi|0> $$

$$= \int \left(\int\limits^{\eta_t=\phi_t}e^{i S[\eta]} D\eta \phi_t(x) \int\limits^{\eta_t=\phi_t}_{\eta_{t'}=\phi_{t'}}e^{i S[\eta]} D\eta \phi_{t'}(y)\int\limits_{\psi_t=\phi_t}e^{i S[\eta]} D\eta \right) D\phi D\psi $$

$$= \int \phi_t(x)\phi_{t'}(y) e^{iS[\phi]} D\phi$$

More or less

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I believe the answer is that the ground state is not the same as the no particle state. Therefor the wave functional should be expanded as:

$$\Psi[\phi,t] = \psi_t + \int \psi_t(x)\phi(x)dx^3 + \int \psi_t(x,y)\phi(x)\phi(y) dx^3 dy^3+...$$

without anything to do with the ground state. Where $\psi(x,y)$ for example is the amplitude for detecting particles at both x and y.

I believe the $a^\pm(x)$ are (de-)excitations in the field at $x$ and not creation/annihilation operators for particles.

I think this is where the confusion lay.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.