# Why does the conjugated $\pi$ bond not violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle?

Let's look at the molecule 1,3 butadiene:

$CH_2=CH-CH=CH_2$

and number the carbon atoms 1 to 4 from left to right.

The bonds between 1 and 2 and between 3 and 4 are double bonds: each constitutes a $σ_{2p}$ and a $π$ bond (molecular orbitals). Studies on bond length and chemical reactivity show unequivocally that the two $π$ bonds do not exist separately but that instead the electron clouds merge into one $π$ molecular orbital, extending over the four carbon nuclei.

Both Atomic and Molecular Orbitals normally only contain 2 electrons, with different Spin Quantum Numbers $m_s$, in order to respect the Pauli Exclusion Principle. A third electron in the same AO or MO would immediately violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle because $m_s=\pm\frac{1}{2}$.

The conjugated $π$ bonds in 1,3 butadiene appear to contain 4 electrons though. How is this not a violation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle?

This (perceived?) problem is even ‘worse’ when we look at the structure of benzene ($C_6H_6$) which for a long time was considered to be made up of six single $σ$ bonds (molecular orbitals) and three double bonds ($σ$ and $π$, molecular orbitals). But such a structure could never be a regular hexagon because (all other things being equal) the bond lengths (i.e. inter-nuclear distances) are less for double bonds than for single ones (this is easy to explain based on electrostatic shielding). Benzene turns out to be perfectly hexagonal.

Also, when substituting two adjacent hydrogen atoms with some other atom (a so-called ortho-substitution) one would expect two different ortho compounds to result but this is not the case: there is only one ortho-substitute.

Text books therefore usually represent the benzene structure as below:

Two $π$ rings containing a total of six electrons hovering in molecular orbitals above and below the $C$ plane, forming one single $π$ molecular orbital. Again, assuming these electrons are in the same quantum state, it’s hard to see how this is not a violation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

• Wouldn't it better suit at Chem SE? BTW, good question.+1.
– user36790
Sep 13, 2015 at 1:57
• @user36790: my experience is that chemists tend to be poor at answering such questions (I'm a chemist myself). The molecules mentioned are of course quantum systems and the question is therefore more physics than chemistry, IMHO. The theory of the chemical bond really is applied QM. Thanks for the upvote.
– Gert
Sep 13, 2015 at 2:01
• @user36790: I'll stop here for a bit. I like it here! ;-)
– Gert
Sep 13, 2015 at 2:50
• Take a look at this question on chemistry.SE. It is essentially a dupe of yours and has excellent answers.
– bon
Sep 13, 2015 at 13:21
• I thought & thought the entire day & concluded that there need to be the same number of molecular orbitals as the number of atomic orbitals that create them; how could I forget that! Also, I've told you earlier that Chem SE might help you; I searched & with the help of @bon, I got this link Pauli exclusion principle and resonance. Check this; it may be helpful. Thanks, sir for this excellent question; it really compelled me to think & think at the end of which I got the above link. Good Luck, sir:)
– user36790
Sep 13, 2015 at 13:50

Just a chemist, but maybe there would've been less confusion in that forum. It's because this is not how the model works. Orbitals are something you get from Hartree-Fock theory (let's leave it at that). Here is how it works in principal, mind you that this is just a model:

Let's take Benzene as an example. You have those atomic orbitals from which you form your molecular orbitals. Take hydrogen: You have one electron from each atom in an s orbital. If you combine them, you get two combinations, one anti-bonding and one bonding. Two atomic orbitals yield two molecular orbitals. The two electrons will sit in that occupied orbital.

Now coming back to benzene: The so-called pi orbitals form from atomic p-orbitals sitting on top of the carbon atoms in the benzene. You can imagine that each carbon gives you one electron in that p orbital to obtain the 6 electrons that according to you occupy that pi orbital. From them you obtain 6 molecular orbitals. Three of them will be occupied with 2 electrons each and 3 will remain empty. There is no violation.

So in short, your mistake is thinking there was only one pi orbital when in fact there are 3 for benzene and 2 for butadiene.

The reason is that also other orbitals are occupied. For example for benzene using the hückel-method you will find following molecular orbitals. The three lowest lying are occupied because of the 6 electrons. The pauli exclusion principle cannot be violated!

Pauli suggests that an orbital can only have upto a maximum of two electrons. But in your case the electrons do not come into a single orbital, rather the orbitals come together to form an electron cloud. Refer: http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Theoretical_Chemistry/Chemical_Bonding/Valence_Bond_Theory/Resonance/Delocalization_of_Electrons

• You are really confusing matters; you said atomic orbitals combine to form electron clouds; right but electron cloud is in the superposition of those atomic orbitals & since the Schroedinger's equation is linear, the superposition of those atomic orbitals also satisfies it & that means the resultant superposed one is also an orbital, a molecular orbital & every orbital contains electron cloud. Hence, that does not at all answer OP's query as every atomic orbital contains electron cloud & that cloud does follow Exclusion Principle.
– user36790
Sep 13, 2015 at 3:08