I am reading about damped harmonic motion in my Physics book (Gerthsen Physik) and there are two things that irritate me:
Stokes friction
It says that Stokes friction would be $$F = -m \gamma \dot{x}.$$ To me, it does not make any sense why it depends on the mass of the object. It means that the deceleration does not depend on the mass. Or is it just since it is proportional to the volume and the volume usually depends on the mass.
linear combination of solutions
Then the differential equation is set up, I fully understand it, except the confusion about the friction.
$$ m \ddot{x} + \gamma \dot{x} + \omega_0^2 = 0 $$
With $$\delta = \frac{\gamma}{2}$$ and $$\omega = \sqrt{\omega_0^2 - \delta^2}$$ the solution to the $$x(t) = \exp(\lambda t)$$ approach are $$\lambda = -\delta \pm i \omega t$$.
One of the plus or minus variants are a valid solution, but the linear combination of both are all solutions. I understand that.
The book then says that the general solution is the combination of real and imaginary parts. Alternatively, one can add a phase angle and have one "compact" solution like this:
$$ x(t) = x_0 \exp(-\delta t) \exp(i ( \omega t + \phi ) ) $$
The $\exp(i \phi)$ certainly makes up a linear combination of real and imaginary parts, but how is it a combination like $$c_1 \exp(i\omega t) + c_2 \exp(-i\omega t) ?$$