I've seen the claim that a function of an operator can be defined as a series. For example, say $A: H_1 \mapsto H_2$ is an operator. Then
$$ e^A \equiv \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{A^n}{n!}. \tag{1}$$
In general, for a function $f$
$$ f(A) \overset{?}{\equiv} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)} (0)}{n!} A^n \tag{2}$$
where $\frac{f^{(n)} (0)}{n!}$ are scalars. Now what about function $f(x) = 1/x$? I would expect that it gives a series expansion for the inverse operator $A^{-1}$. But $1/x$ is undefined for $x=0$ so this function doesn't have the Maclaurin series given by $(2)$. Do we just use a general Taylor series around point $a$
$$ f(A) \overset{?}{\equiv} \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)} (a)}{n!} (A - a)^n ? \tag{3}$$
If so, shouldn't we prove that this definition is unambiguous for different $a$?