0
$\begingroup$

"Average KE" as in this equation:

$$K_{average} = \frac{3}{2} kT$$

Since potential energy in ideal gas model is eliminated, I guess this equation is also for the total thermal energy of a gas/a system.

Also, is it just for a single gas molecule? Is there a simple algebraic derivation for the equation? (Just provide the source)

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

"Thermal energy" is a bit of a misnomer because "thermal" really refers to a method of energy transfer, not energy storage. When energy moves from one system to another, it can do so via a thermal process (e.g. conduction, convection, radiation) or a mechanical process (something pushes on something else). So technically, I wouldn't call $\frac{3}{2}kT$ the thermal energy, but rather the internal energy per particle.

Nevertheless, $\frac{3}{2}kT$ is equal to the average kinetic energy per particle, for an ideal gas whose particles have no relevant dynamics other than translation. (I.e. they can only move, but not rotate, vibrate, change shape, or interact.) You can prove it by first calculating the entropy of an ideal gas, as shown in the Wikipedia article on the Gibbs paradox. In the derivation, the internal energy $U$ is taken to be equal to the kinetic energy. The entropy depends on $U$ in the form $S = kN\ln U^{3/2} + \cdots$, so you can then take the derivative and set it equal to $1/T$: $$\frac{1}{T} = \frac{\partial S}{\partial U} = \frac{3}{2}\frac{kN}{U}$$ This is easily rearranged to $U = \frac{3}{2}NkT$, and the energy per particle is $U/N = \frac{3}{2}kT$ as expected.

$\endgroup$
12
  • $\begingroup$ Is thermal energy (microscopic KE and PE) simply the hotness of something? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 4, 2015 at 15:18
  • $\begingroup$ Is temperature a indicator of the thermal energy of two EQUAL SIZED objects? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 4, 2015 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ Size has nothing to do with it. And actually, temperature in general is not an indicator of thermal energy, only of the tendency to transfer energy. $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Commented Aug 4, 2015 at 15:49
  • $\begingroup$ But a icy cold iceberg has more thermal energy than a cup of hot boiling water? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 4, 2015 at 15:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps best to check Wikipedia on the topic. $\endgroup$
    – David Z
    Commented Aug 4, 2015 at 16:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.