0
$\begingroup$

I was reading about how a Fourier transform yields the wave-function expressed in terms of the momenta which constitute it, i.e. the wave-function in momentum space.

I'm not so good at calculus yet so I couldn't do this yet: what would happen, qualitatively, if we took the inverse Fourier transform of a wave-function? I figure it would yield something which is constituted by the probability amplitudes of a wave-function, does that mean it will yield 1?

Relevant information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Starting with a function in coordinate space its Fourier transform is an element of momentum space. Taking the Fourier transform of the latter we obtain tne original function but the coordinates have acquired a minus sign. Its Fourier transform then have the momenta with a minus sign so applying the Fourier transform once more we are back to the original function. Thus the inverse of a wave function is the momentum space wave function with a negative sign of the momenta. $\endgroup$
    – Urgje
    Commented Feb 11, 2015 at 8:25

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Let's drop the scaling constants and say that the wavefunction in momentum co-ordinates $\psi_p(\vec{p})$ is the FT of that $\psi_x(\vec{x})$ in position co-ordinates , i.e.

$$\psi_p(\vec{p}) = \mathfrak{F}_{\vec{p}}(\psi_x(\vec{x}))$$

where $\mathfrak{F}$ is the Fourier transform. Now you propose to take the inverse Fourier transform of $\psi_x$. The inverse FT is simply the same as the Fourier transform but with the sign of the transform variable switched. So we have, from the equation above:

$$\mathfrak{F}_{\vec{p}}^{-1}(\psi_x(\vec{x}))=\mathfrak{F}_{-\vec{p}}(\psi_x(\vec{x})) = \psi_p(-\vec{p})$$

So your operation simply calculates the state written in momentum co-ordinates, but with all the co-ordinates multiplied by $-1$. In one dimension, this would simply mean reflexion of the function $\psi_p(p)$ in the ordinate axis.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm alright, I was thinking that it would lead to an expression in (something)-space. $\endgroup$
    – Mir
    Commented Feb 11, 2015 at 19:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.