4
$\begingroup$

When an object moves, I assume that the air above it, instead of remaining at the same general height, is pulled downward as it is passed in order to fill the low-pressure area behind the object where air was just left behind.

So if that's correct so far:

Assume we have a cube (1 m x 1 m for example) that can move very fast at perpendicular angles to it's sides (up, down, left, right, front, back).

At sea level, how fast would the cube need to move to reach the point where the force of displacement is higher than the force of the low-pressure zone attracting the air passing over the cube, causing a vacuum to occur?

Or rather, is there no speed at which this vacuum would be created?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Define what you mean by 'vacuum'. It's not possible to have a perfect vacuum - even deep intergalactic space has some level of partial vacuum. $\endgroup$ – Time4Tea Jan 22 '15 at 21:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Relevant / interesting / related: what-if.xkcd.com/1 $\endgroup$ – Brandon Enright Jan 22 '15 at 21:57
6
$\begingroup$

If molecules of air were very slow moving, and the cube came zipping through, then the cube would cut a 1 m x 1 m square tunnel of vacuum through the air, which would slowly be filled in by air molecules from above and below moving in to it.

So as long as the cube moves faster than air molecules, some of that tunnel will stay evacuated behind the tube. How fast do air molecules move? Still air at STP has its air molecules zipping around randomly with each species of air molecule having a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of velocities. From http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/chem03/chem03448.htm we see an "average" air molecule is moving at around 500 m/s.

But in a thermal distribution, LOTS of air molecules are moving faster than the average, but at higher velocities the distribution falls off quite steeply. The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution shows the probability distributions for thermal air molecule velocities. Looking at the CDF's, we can see that nearly all the molecules have a velocity within a factor of 3 or 4 times the average velocity.

Then if the 1 m cube were moving at 2000 m/s, we would expect a pyramid shaped region on the back of the pyramid with pyramid peak about 0.5 m behind the cube, within which the density of air would be less than about 1% of STP.

So 2000 m/s, 2 km/s, 7200 km/hr should do the trick. For reference this is about 7 times the speed of sound at sea level.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is highly idealized and neglects a lot of important stuff about how the displaced air interacts with the passing object in ways that would generally reduce both the quality of the vacuum and the volume of the affected region. Which is not to say that it is wrong. $\endgroup$ – dmckee Feb 7 '15 at 0:00
  • $\begingroup$ Unsatisfied by the answer as it does not consider at the molecular level near cube when its traveling at that speed. Refer this link $\endgroup$ – Jimmy Kudo Apr 6 '16 at 18:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.