3
$\begingroup$

If an object is rotated on its axis near the speed of light would its mass increase?

Normally if the object was moving (in relationship to the Earth for example) I would agree that its mass would increase. I think, when rotating that it won't increase mass, but I can't prove it.

In the other hand if $E=mc^2$ and $E$ is the energy of motion, does that mean that rotation has energy of motion?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/76835 $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 14, 2014 at 23:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Short, short version: the mass of a system can be either more or less than the mass of the components. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 14, 2014 at 23:13
  • $\begingroup$ @dmckee Although that post is somewhat related, I am talking about rotating at the speed of light or close to it. I appreciate it though, it was a good read, but I still have this burning question. I think they solved the question by concentrating on forces while I am interested in mass. $\endgroup$
    – J_Strauton
    Commented Nov 15, 2014 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ If you read Mark Eichenlaub's answer carefully, you'll that he casually states that the lawnmower's "mass" increases due to $E = mc^2$. The question is - which "mass"? It's the "relativistic mass", which is really not a good concept, as it is not invariant under change of reference frames (in a comoving frame, the "mass" increase is gone again!). Just stick to rest masses. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented Nov 15, 2014 at 0:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind: We are referring to rest mass. Rest mass isn't additive and depends on the motion of the objects comprising the system. $\endgroup$
    – user4552
    Commented Nov 15, 2014 at 1:20

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Yes, this is certainly true. Mass is defined by $m^2=E^2-p^2$ (in units with $c=1$), where $(E,p)$ is the momentum four-vector built out of the mass-energy and momentum. (This defines what's known as invariant mass, as opposed to "relativistic mass.") Mass as defined in this way is not additive, and depends on the motion of the particles within a system.

As a simple example, say we have two masses $m$ at the ends of a massless stick. When the stick is at rest and not rotating, the momentum four-vectors are both $(m,0)$, the sum is $(2m,0)$, and the mass of the system is $2m$.

Now let the stick rotate end over end. The momentum vectors are now $(m\gamma,m\gamma v)$ and $(m\gamma,-m\gamma v)$. The total momentum four-vector is $(2m\gamma,0)$, which means the mass of the system is $2m\gamma$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.