4
$\begingroup$

The Boomerang Nebula is often cited as one of the coldest natural places in the universe at 1 K, but that's about 10 orders of magnitude off from what's been created in a lab.

Are there theoretical mechanisms that can inherently trump our (apparent) mastery of cold or is the coldest place in the universe likely to be some scientist's lab (here or elsewhere)?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

Everything in the universe is bathed in the glow of the cosmic microwave background, and this has a temperature of about 2.7K. By this temperature I mean a black body at 2.7K in equilibrium with the CMB would neither heat up nor cool down.

So we expect large objects to have a temperature of at least 2.7K because if they were cooler the CMB would heat them up. At the moment the Boomerang Nebula appears to be cooling due to its expansion faster than the CMB can heat it up again. However in the fullness of time the CMB will reheat it so the low temperature is only temporary. If you're interested to learn more the paper describing the temperature measurements is here.

We can temporarily create extremely low temperatures in the lab because we can use energy to pump heat out and then insulate the experiment from the surrounding higher temperatures. However without an infinite power source this can only be temporary, and in the longer term our experiment has to warm up again.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, everything will eventually equilibrate, but natural sources of power eclipse artificial by a not so small amount. None of them are believed to beat the Boomerang's mechanism or at least its effect by much more? $\endgroup$
    – Nick T
    Commented Sep 6, 2014 at 8:35
  • $\begingroup$ @NickT: If you want to generate ultracold temperatures, it's not about power, but about creating order in a well insulated space. Power is, indeed, counterproductive, because it generates heat.So if you want, humans are far better at creating order than the universe is, at least in very small places. $\endgroup$
    – CuriousOne
    Commented Sep 6, 2014 at 14:22
  • $\begingroup$ @CuriousOne: Yep, see for example how adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators work: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_refrigeration $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Sep 16, 2014 at 16:17
1
$\begingroup$

Temperature changes using thermodynamic means occur asymptotically. That means cooling through volume expansion is limited. Currently, the lowest temperature reached by humans is 1.0 × 10-10 Kevlins. The star would have to eject gas at near the speed of light to reach that temperature.

A super massive black hole would produce an event horizon with lower temperatures, but a Bose–Einstein condensate, like the one to set the record, should be able to go even lower.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.