2
$\begingroup$

(Boyer-Lindquist coordinates and $ c = G =1 $ taken)

As I know, line element in Kerr metric $ d s^2 = - \left( 1 - \frac{2Mr}{\rho^2} \right) d t^2 - \frac{4 M a r \sin^2 \theta}{\rho^2} d \phi d t + \frac{\rho^2}{\Delta} d r^2 + \rho^2 d \theta^2 + \left( r^2 + a^2 + \frac{2 M r a^2 \sin^2 \theta}{\rho^2} \right) \sin^2 \theta d \phi^2 $ where $ a = \frac{J}{M}, \rho^2 = r^2 + a^2 \cos^2 \theta, \Delta = r^2 - 2 M r + a^2 $ suggests that causality breaks where $ r = M \pm \sqrt{M^2 - a^2} $.

How should I handle when $ a^2 > M^2 $ so $ r $ is complex?

For example, the Sun's mass, $ M_\odot \approx 1.5 \text{km} $ while it's angular momentum, $ J_\odot \approx 4.7 * 10^{19} \text{km}^2 > M_\odot ^2 $.

Will black holes with angular momentum bigger than mass squared not form an event horizon?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ As an aside: $4 M a r sin^2 \theta$ would look better as $4 M a r \sin^2 \theta$. Just using \sin instead of sin. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1 at 13:33
  • $\begingroup$ Editted. Thanks for the advise. @JosBergervoet $\endgroup$
    – posfn0319
    Commented Mar 1 at 13:35
  • $\begingroup$ Please clarify your specific problem or provide additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it's hard to tell exactly what you're asking. $\endgroup$
    – Community Bot
    Commented Mar 1 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ BTW, the Sun's Schwarzschild radius, is ~2.95325007702 km $\endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    Commented Mar 1 at 18:23

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

If the mass is in the form of a material body like the earth where the spin parameter is $\rm a=J c/(G M)=890 M$, it would have to lose some angular momentum until $\rm a<M$ before it could collapse into a black hole, otherwise it can't since the centrifugal repulsion is larger than the centripetal attraction.

If the mass is in the form of a singularity that would be a naked singularity, and if it is an elementary particles like the electron where $\rm a$ is many orders of magnitudes larger than $\rm M$ and $\rm r=0$ as well the close field should be gravitationally repulsive.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

According to Kerr and Penrose, bodies with $ a\ge m $ can not exist in our universe.

They are mathematical objects with naked singularities (ring of diameter $ a $) and are not black holes (no event horizon).

Hoping to have answered your question,

Best regards.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Extended objects and elementary particles both commonly have a>m. Just nothing massive AND pointlike. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 30 at 21:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.