It seems like you have too many misconceptions to get the answer.
You should be using the differential forms version, and the theorems in that framework, to relate everything together. You should be starting with [note sign change between Equation (1) and (2)]
\begin{align}
\tag1F=&E_x\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dt+E_y\,\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dt+E_z\,\mathrm dz\wedge\mathrm dt+B_x\,\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz+B_y\,\mathrm dz\wedge\mathrm dx+B_z\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\\
\tag2\star F=&B_x\,\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dx+B_y\,\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dy+B_z\,\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dz+E_x\,\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz+E_y\,\mathrm dz\wedge\mathrm dx+E_z\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\\
\mathrm d\!\star\!F=&+(\partial_xE_x+\partial_yE_y+\partial_zE_z)\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz-(\partial_yB_z-\partial_zB_y-\partial_tE_x)\,\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz\\
\tag3&-(\partial_zB_x-\partial_xB_z-\partial_tE_y)\,\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dz\wedge\mathrm dx-(\partial_xB_y-\partial_yB_x-\partial_tE_z)\,\mathrm dt\wedge\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\\
\tag4\star J=&-\rho\star\!\mathrm dt+j_x\star\!\mathrm dx+j_y\star\!\mathrm dy+j_z\star\!\mathrm dz\\
\tag5\therefore\ \rho=&\vec\nabla\cdot\vec E\qquad\bigwedge\qquad\vec J+\partial_t\vec E=\vec\nabla\times\vec B
\end{align}
where we have compared Equations (4) and (3) to get (5). Now, we can try to use $\int_\Omega\mathrm d\!\star\!F=\int_{\partial\Omega}\star F$
$$\tag{6, Gauß's Law}\int_\Omega\rho\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz=\oint_{\partial\Omega} E_x\,\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz+E_y\,\mathrm dz\wedge\mathrm dx+E_z\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy$$
$$\tag7\mathrm dt\wedge\oint_{\partial\Omega}B_x\,\mathrm dx+B_y\,\mathrm dy+B_z\,\mathrm dz=\mathrm dt\wedge\int_\Omega(j_x+\partial_tE_x)\,\mathrm dy\wedge\mathrm dz+(j_y+\partial_tE_y)\,\mathrm dz\wedge\mathrm dx\\+(j_z+\partial_tE_z)\,\mathrm dx\wedge\mathrm dy\qquad\text{(Ampère-Maxwell)}$$
That is, these are a mix of 3-forms and 2-forms, and 1-forms are not supposed to be appearing in them.