6
$\begingroup$

In Witten's note https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04993, during the proof of Reeh-Schlieder theorem, he made an arguement that considering a function $$g(u)=\langle\chi|\phi(x_1)\dots e^{\mathrm{i}Hu}\phi(x_n)|\Omega\rangle\,.$$ Because the hamiltonian $H$ is bounded below by $0$, the operator $\exp(\mathrm{i}Hu)$ is holomorphic for $u$ in the upper half plane so that the function $g(u)$ is also holomorphic. Why the holomorphy of this function is connected to the boundness of $H$ and the reigon of $u$? I suppose that the upper half plane limit of $u$ is to stop the term $\exp(-Im(u)H )$ diverge to infinity, yet I am still confused by its relation to the holomorphy of the function.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Let $\psi, \phi$ be two Hilbert space vectors. According to the spectral theorem, a signed measure $\mu_{\psi,\phi}$ with bounded variation exists such that $$\langle \psi, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}uH} \phi\rangle = \int_{\sigma(H)} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}u\lambda} \mathrm{d} \mu_{\psi,\phi}(\lambda),$$ where $\sigma(H)$ is the spectrum of $H$. Thus, the complex derivative of $\langle \psi, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}uH} \phi\rangle$ can be computed as follows: $$\partial_u \langle \psi, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}uH} \phi\rangle = \int_{\sigma(H)} \mathrm{i} \lambda \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}u\lambda} \mathrm{d} \mu_{\psi,\phi}(\lambda).$$ If the imaginary part of $u$ is strictly positive (i.e. $\Im(u) > 0)$, the integral on the r.h.s. is convergent: $$\left| \int_{\sigma(H)} \mathrm{i} \lambda \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}u\lambda} \mathrm{d} \mu_{\psi,\phi}(\lambda) \right| \leq \int_{\sigma(H)} |\lambda| \mathrm{e}^{-\Im(u)\lambda} \mathrm{d} |\mu_{\psi,\phi}|(\lambda) < \infty,$$ where I used that $\sup_{\lambda \in \sigma(H)}|\lambda| \mathrm{e}^{-\Im(u)\lambda}$ is finite (this uses that the spectrum of $H$ is bounded from below and that the exponential decays faster than any polynomial). This ensures that the complex derivative of $\langle \psi, \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}uH} \phi\rangle$ exists.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.