On Section 3.2 of Carroll's Spacetime and Geometry, he works on the proof of how Christoffel symbols transform under a change of coordinate system, in order to the covariant derivative of a tensor continue to be a tensor. On equation (3.9), he writes:
$$\Gamma^{\nu'}_{\mu' \lambda'}\dfrac{\partial x^{\lambda'}}{\partial x^\lambda}V^\lambda + \dfrac{\partial x^\mu}{\partial x^{\mu'}}V^\lambda\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\dfrac{\partial x^{\nu'}}{\partial x^\lambda} = \dfrac{\partial x^\mu}{\partial x^{\mu'}}\dfrac{\partial x^{\nu'}}{\partial x^\nu}\Gamma^{\nu}_{\mu \lambda}V^\lambda. \tag{3.9}$$ This equation must be true for any vector $V^\lambda$, so we can eliminate that on both sides. Then the connection coefficients in the primed coordinates may be isolated by multiplying by $\dfrac{\partial x^\lambda}{\partial x^{\sigma'}}$ and relabeling $\sigma' \rightarrow \lambda'$. The result is $$\Gamma^{\nu'}_{\mu' \lambda'} = \dfrac{\partial x^\mu}{\partial x^{\mu'}}\dfrac{\partial x^\lambda}{\partial x^{\lambda'}}\dfrac{\partial x^{\nu'}}{\partial x^\nu}\Gamma^{\nu}_{\mu \lambda} + \dfrac{\partial x^\mu}{\partial x^{\mu'}}\dfrac{\partial x^\lambda}{\partial x^{\lambda'}}\dfrac{\partial^2 x^{\nu'}}{\partial x^\mu\partial x^\lambda}.\tag{3.10}$$
However, as far as I can see, there should be a minus sign in the middle of the expression, not a plus. Was that a typo by Carroll?
Besides, if I choose to isolate the unprimed Christoffel symbol instead of the primed one, I obtain
$$\Gamma^{\nu}_{\mu \lambda} = \dfrac{\partial x^{\mu'}}{\partial x^{\mu}}\dfrac{\partial x^{\lambda'}}{\partial x^{\lambda}}\dfrac{\partial x^{\nu}}{\partial x^{\nu'}}\Gamma^{\nu'}_{\mu' \lambda'} + \dfrac{\partial x^\nu}{\partial x^{\nu'}}\dfrac{\partial^2 x^{\nu'}}{\partial x^\mu\partial x^\lambda}$$
Shouldn't there be some kind of symmetry between the transformation formulas? In the sense that if in this last equation I just prime what is unprimed and unprime what is primed, shouldn't I obtain the transformation law from the unprimed Christoffel symbols to the primed ones? (I really don't know if that's true, but intuitively it seems so, because the indices shouldn't matter).