The question arises from my confusion over the two definitions of work (relevant to classical mechanics) I've encountered:
- $W= \int \vec F\cdot\mathrm{d}\vec x$
- $W=$ net change in energy of a system
We define the mechanical energy for a state to be the sum of the kinetic and potential energies, and then define a conservative force as one that doesn't change/conserves a system's mechanical energy. By the second definition, this implies that conservative forces like gravitational force do no work on a mechanical system, but this conflicts with the statements in my reference book and the ones I have read on the internet. They reason, with the (aforementioned) first definition: if a non-zero conservative force $\vec F$ acts along and throughout a body's non-zero displacement, the work ($W=\int\vec F\cdot\mathrm{d}\vec x$) should be non-zero, and therefore a conservative force does work.
Which of the aforesaid is actually true, and why?